Then you get a Lita, who didn't give a s**t really, but still got on with his job
and was brilliant
Posted By: pants on February 2nd 2009 at 23:16:49
Message Thread
- After we Critizised Roader for bringing so many loan players (General Chat) - ghostof barry butler, Feb 2, 22:16:16
- "we" (General Chat) - Tombs, Feb 2, 22:43:56
- What pisses me off (General Chat) - Bryan Salad Surgery, Feb 2, 22:48:18
- Then you get a Lita, who didn't give a shit really, but still got on with his job (General Chat) - pants, Feb 2, 23:16:49
- easy slag off intut (General Chat) - Tombs, Feb 2, 22:53:27
- What pisses me off (General Chat) - Bryan Salad Surgery, Feb 2, 22:48:18
- Seems simple enough to me - (General Chat) - KentonCanary, Feb 2, 22:39:17
- But that is exactly the position Roeder was in (n/m) (General Chat) - Bryan Salad Surgery, Feb 2, 22:44:36
- I'm not so sure about that - (General Chat) - KentonCanary, Feb 2, 23:13:41
- Are you a new fan btw? (General Chat) - Bryan Salad Surgery, Feb 2, 23:23:33
- No I'm not a new fan (General Chat) - KentonCanary, Feb 3, 06:12:54
- Well... (General Chat) - Bryan Salad Surgery, Feb 2, 23:22:13
- Are you a new fan btw? (General Chat) - Bryan Salad Surgery, Feb 2, 23:23:33
- I'm not so sure about that - (General Chat) - KentonCanary, Feb 2, 23:13:41
- But that is exactly the position Roeder was in (n/m) (General Chat) - Bryan Salad Surgery, Feb 2, 22:44:36
- Blimey, err (General Chat) - CB41, Feb 2, 22:26:35
- It's the boards fault not Gunn's (General Chat) - Ben, Feb 2, 22:25:48
- I'm with you on that now. They've hired and fired for years now (General Chat) - pants, Feb 2, 22:31:50
- our turnover of managers last 8 years has been tiny (n/m) (General Chat) - SCC 28, Feb 2, 22:51:03
- Is that stat relevant? (n/m) (General Chat) - pants, Feb 2, 23:02:20
- yes (n/m) (General Chat) - SCC 28, Feb 2, 23:09:23
- What was the 8 years bit about then? (n/m) (General Chat) - pants, Feb 2, 23:19:32
- low turnover (n/m) (General Chat) - SCC 28, Feb 2, 23:54:57
- So a bit like Reading didn't beat us for 85 minutes at the Madjeski? (n/m) (General Chat) - pants, Feb 3, 00:22:59
- no nothing like that (n/m) (General Chat) - SCC 28, Feb 3, 00:27:09
- So a bit like Reading didn't beat us for 85 minutes at the Madjeski? (n/m) (General Chat) - pants, Feb 3, 00:22:59
- low turnover (n/m) (General Chat) - SCC 28, Feb 2, 23:54:57
- What was the 8 years bit about then? (n/m) (General Chat) - pants, Feb 2, 23:19:32
- yes (n/m) (General Chat) - SCC 28, Feb 2, 23:09:23
- Is that stat relevant? (n/m) (General Chat) - pants, Feb 2, 23:02:20
- our turnover of managers last 8 years has been tiny (n/m) (General Chat) - SCC 28, Feb 2, 22:51:03
- Hoorah!!! First "sack the board" post for, what, two days? (n/m) (General Chat) - CB41, Feb 2, 22:27:18
- I'm with you on that now. They've hired and fired for years now (General Chat) - pants, Feb 2, 22:31:50
- And scottish players too "no more loans" "no more scottish shit" (General Chat) - pants, Feb 2, 22:24:50
- I think the obvious answer which I'm starting to realise, is fans will say anything (General Chat) - pants, Feb 2, 22:28:25
- I think anything not associated with Roeder is a positive frankly. (n/m) (General Chat) - shoddy, Feb 2, 22:22:25
- but "all them fukern loons" was official Roeder policy, we all know that for sure don't we (General Chat) - Higher Wrather, Feb 2, 22:48:54
- The team is being managed by people the fans love, so the composition of the squad (General Chat) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Feb 2, 22:21:10
- I'm probably way off-beam here (General Chat) - Bryan Salad Surgery, Feb 2, 23:26:56
- We're fickle (n/m) (General Chat) - Buckscanary, Feb 2, 22:17:56
- "we" (General Chat) - Tombs, Feb 2, 22:43:56
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.