Most assuredly WW2, but I've only just seen this

Roeder re the 2nd half of the Palace game:

"In that withdrawn role behind Lita, Wes again had a real impact on the game," admitted the City chief. "And, again, should have proved to everyone that when you play one up through the middle and basically play 4-3-3 it is just as attack-minded as 4-4-2. And we were camped in their half for virtually the whole of the second-half."

If he really believes that that formation is as attacking as 4-4-2, why the f*ck did he drop Wes, rather than start with it?

(Sorry if this has been done to death - haven't been around....)

Posted By: Tricky Hawes, Nov 28, 13:47:25