OK - question for others when they wake up

I'm 95% in agreement with what SCC's been saying, and have always assumed it's Carroll who's under suspicion here. But are we absolutely sure that the scam couldn't have involved those laying Norwich at such bizarre odds at half time?

I assume not - because from what I've read, it all revolved around what the result of the second half was. And with it being 1-1, no-one will have made a thing on the Asian Handicap? But I just figured I'd check, as I can't help but feel slightly queasy. Especially given when I watched the highlights online about 10 days ago, literally my first thought was "hang on - Marshall could've got back to stop that"...

Posted By: thebigfeller, Oct 17, 04:15:59