Fundamental flaw in that is

"3) Score changes are related to specific decisions only (e.g. a red card for a player does not change the score - even if the player who scores should not have been on the pitch at the time.)"

Those instances are the very things that change games dramactically

I can see why the tables don't vary in position much, if one of the main controversies isn't dealt with

It's the same propaganda/excuses the ref association hide behind when saying "open to interpretation", stick up for refs, then you find said official is taken of matches for two weeks

Why remove them from games if you think they've done nothing wrong?

Posted By: pants, Aug 7, 12:23:16