You're the one that's blubbing.

The points I make (wich you seem to agree with) have everything to do with how Roeder has treated Hucks.

We now have competition for places for example, you were banging on about Semi possibly being a little upset yesterday because he lost his place to Bates.

What do you want? People playing for their places and bringing the best out of them as a result (which is clearly happening) or people knowing their place in the side is safe?

You don't seem to be able to cross the barrier of this one issue to see that Roeder has treated them all much the same. They've all been given their chances. Everyone from Brellier, Murray, etc through to the loanees and Hucks.

I totally and utterly accept that Hucks ought to be at least on the bench but only if he is mentally and physically up to it.

Posted By: Chalk Hill Bitter, Feb 15, 11:51:52