So what's the agenda here then?

I particularly like the Ferrari-ing of time periods, with 2006/2007 only sometimes being included. For instance:

"The graph below shows the total amount of money paid to the directors of the club.

The figures involved are very small. When this is compared with other clubs the amount is amazingly small. "

A conclusion which is achieved by ignoring 2006/2007 when the figure concerned was more than 8 times higher than in 2005/2006, meaning that pretty little graph would have to be roughly twice as big as it is.

"The intention of the site is not to try and influence your opinion on the way the club has been run, just to give you the facts, and let you draw your own conclusions."

Yeah right.

Posted By: Winged Eel Creosote, Dec 21, 09:49:58