ho ho ho

"The intention of the site is not to try and influence your opinion on the way the club has been run, just to give you the facts, and let you draw your own conclusions."

And yet despite clearly demonstrating that £46m has been spent on wages since 2004 your mate says that the £40m Prem money "seems to have disappeared with little to show for it".

Losing the barbed comment might make the site seem less of a fait accompli.

I also suggest that the overall wages / income ratio should be highlighted more than the players wages / income ratio - after all, our income is still the same yet the non-playering staff wage bill is nearly 5 mill p.a.

And finally, these figures do confirm that our debt repayments are by no means crippling - the PROFIT from the catering operation covers nearly 2/3 of the annual interest.

And finally finally, can he make all stats comparable? Some graphs include 07 figures while others don't.

Posted By: east of hampstead, Dec 21, 09:42:47