I know we haven't seen the new signings in action yet but

I think most of us would agree that in general they all seem favourable and cover positions where we've felt that improvements have been needed for some time. With this in mind, it does make you wonder what Worthington was thinking of and compounds the question why did the Board stick with him so long? I know this seems a bit negative but the Board do seem to be lacking when it comes to the football side of things. What do the rest of you think?

Posted By: Chopper, Jul 9, 16:12:35