User Posted Link
Essentially they are suggesting the former marital home was sold at a grossly inflated price by Rayner and the ex husband to the trust established for her severely disabled child (trust funds paid by compensation from the NHS).
The reasons for this would be to extract maximum funds possible for Mr and Mrs Rayner, err hang on a moment surely this isn’t in the best interest of their son and his trust? (Set up to look after him for life remember).
Sickening really, and I am not posting this as an anti Labour post, because this is Rayner not the Labour Party.
And then this is before we consider the underpayment of stamp duty (tax evasion).
She needs to get the f**k out
Posted By: JoeyDeacon, Sep 5, 06:51:18
Written & Designed By Ben Graves 1999-2025