Kvistgaarden release clause
Does anyone else just think this can't be true?
If Lens were really willing to pay £10.9m then wouldn't there be teams queuing round the block for him at £6.9m?
Either the Lens thing isn't true, we're paying more than that or the clause was more specific like an English team or one that plays in yellow. I'm going former.
Posted By: Kangol Canary, Jul 8, 08:39:29
Follow Ups
- 3The 6.9 release clause....
Posted By: usacanary, Jul 8, 11:26:16 - I believe the release clause only applied to an English club.
Posted By: Darren Eadie, Jul 8, 09:57:26 - Please don’t jinx it
Posted By: Old Git, Jul 8, 09:04:39 - Maybe the release clause is different for a lower tear club like ourselves?
Posted By: Trent_Canary, Jul 8, 09:03:22 - Does seem a bit odd
Posted By: JD3, Jul 8, 09:01:53 - 3Feel like there is more to it than we are bring told but most transfer fees are PR spin
Posted By: Clean Shirt, Jul 8, 09:01:22 - I would imagine the reporting on the lens bid amount was wrong
Posted By: jAC, Jul 8, 08:59:09 - Does it really matter?
Posted By: LincolnshireCanary, Jul 8, 08:55:17
Reply to Message
Written & Designed By Ben Graves 1999-2025