be differently effective? So that if you were to take 2, each 60% effective, your chances of immunity would be greater than 60%?
I'm not suggesting that striking the right balance is straightforward, or that no interference in ordinary life is justified, but some (I don't mean you) seem reluctant even to contemplate that there are other circumstances to be weighed. Or maybe they're not, and it's just one of the joys of inadequate discussion by message board ...
Did you watch Sumption's lecture? It's not difficult to guess where he's going to end up, but very interesting anyway.
Posted By: paulg, Oct 29, 10:10:48
Written & Designed By Ben Graves 1999-2025