Thanks OG

The reason to have the judgment set aside is due to the adverse effect on FIL's credit rating; he wasn't aware of the judgment until a few weeks ago when he was looking to lease a new car, however for obvious reasons the leasing company refused his application.

I believe that there was a balance outstanding on the judgment when the claimant company went bust, and I suppose the risk with seeking to restore is that they may then look to enforce the debt....one for him to weigh up as to which is more important to him.

Thanks for your advice, much appreciated.

Posted By: Jacksons_Twelfth, Feb 13, 13:37:52