No.

If they can't prove who was driving and you have made every effort to do so then they have no chance of winning a court case.

See this.......

In 2001, Head of Middlesbrough CID, Detective Superintendent Adrian Roberts, appealed against a fixed penalty notice that he had received for allegdedly doing 35 in a 30 zone. Detective Superintendent Roberts, 36, was filmed driving at 35mph in a 30mph zone and a fixed penalty notice was sent to his home. He took the notice to the head of the force's administration of justice department and told him he couldn't remember if he'd been driving at the time. Superintendent Graham Cummings decided to scrap the ticket after ruling the photographic evidence was inconclusive, The Times reports. As the Police are not above the law - you should be treated in the same manner. So if you cant recall who was driving and the photographs dont show the driver then a letter should get it dropped as above. If it does not then another letter detailing the case of Detective Superintendent Adrian Roberts and requesting why his was dropped and yours was not, should bring about a result.

Also, the fact that their info was out of date and incorrect is not your fault, it's theirs. BTW, you could try attacking them on the Data Protection Act for failing to keep accurate records.

Basically, keep at them. They can't win.

Posted By: BeverlyHills0201, Feb 3, 11:59:13