It is somewhat ludicrous that last time we got relegated our best paid director still picked up a bonus in excess of ?350,000 for hitting financial targets and took home over ?1.1m in total. For a season that can only have been considered a total and utter failure.
The board have alluded to the fact that "hitting financial targets" meant clearing the debt but what does it mean now. Is it still maintaining our debt free status? I don;t know, but if it were do you think there is a conflict between having a CEO who is effectively rewarded handsomely for "balancing the books" even if we get relegated and genuine ambition to stay in the premier league?
Posted By: Jim, Mar 10, 09:14:33
Written & Designed By Ben Graves 1999-2025