I got the impression...

that the expence was not just about sacking Worthington but also the cost of bringing someone new in. If we wanted to appoint someone from another club we would have to pay compensation to that club so I may be wrong but it seems to me that the only real option would be to bring in either someone who is currently out of work (and they are out of work for a reason) or to promote someone from within. I think the club are therefore right when they say sacking Worthington does not guarantee that we will do any better because we would have either a failed manager or someone from the current regime who will continue to work in the same way.

Posted By: Clare, Dec 14, 09:13:45