Noooooo, I'm not having that at all. No one ever batted an eyelid about loan costs

until we got Roeder. It just evolved into something to beat him with, because his permanent signings weren't for much money

You can't just revert from suggesting they cost a fortune, to "I reckon Gunn didn't spend that much"

They're either the cheaper option, or they're not, no inbetweens

Posted By: pants, Oct 10, 15:04:40