indeed. For example teh Telegraph link EtuWHO posted

User Posted Link

read the headline, and subheader - which is obviously all EtuWHO did - and then read the actual story itself, which actually includes a few facts they obviously felt they couldn't leave out.

(ie all found guilty on basis of other evidence, all pleaded guilty, one admitted hate crime, none are appealing.)

The telegraph is as filthy as the Mail, as you say. Why would you want to mislead people, and encourage paranoia, like that? Does it really shift copies?

Posted By: Tricky Hawes, Oct 22, 16:20:23