I despair reading this board at times

The reason we aren't doing fantastically well in the championship is due to having had a poor season. Big deal, it happens to almost everyone at this level, this year is our turn. Ok, things haven't turned out well at all this season (it's been a disaster in fact), and in hindsight we can see why. But I can't remember people complaining about Roeder being appointed when he saved us and we stayed up. Now it was an "obvious mistake" by our board. Really? Since when has football at this level been an exact science? People say the board have a disastrous record when appointing managers. Then they name certain failures. Name me a Championship club that hasn't changed manager in the last 2 - 3 years due to said manager being percieved as an awful appointment?

Rioch - good appointment, good record, didn't do too badly, just never did brilliantly. Resigned.

Hamilton - disaster

Worthy - overall great success but as is inevitable at this level, ended on poor terms

Grant - disaster but fair enough gamble I guess.

Roeder - good appointment initially, saved us, had good ideas, spoke out of turn majorly and ruined all the good work. Sacked. Good decision and can't see much fault with the board here.

Lack of ambition - do you mean lack of money?

"It's the fans' fault for still going" - will not turning up make the board magic up some money from nowhere? Will protesting make the board find investment more quickly? I don't think so, I'm sure people will argue differently.

"I'm going to send my season ticket back as a protest" - good, and don't come back. We have no devine right to a good football team and surely when you started supporting a team like Norwich you realised this?

I appreciate this will bring out the seethers, I appreciate it's a minority view, but it's my view

Posted By: Charles21, Apr 26, 20:23:55