There's plenty to criticise the board for both the non exucitive and the executive however

the budget for this season was suffcient and not signing the striker we needed was not Delia and Michael's fault.

I think the crux of the our argument is, who is to blame for what? And i think Delia and Michael are being blamed for things that were not in their control and this is what some of us are arguing against and not the fact that we think Delia and Michael are without blame whatsoever.

I honestly believe in any other industry a CE who has failed to deliver on many of the key performance indicators, (all of which contribute to the lack of results on matchday) would not still be in a job, now why is Doncaster still in his position and that is a criticism I agree with that Delia and Michael are to blame for.

Posted By: stringersrevenge, Mar 24, 16:19:23