agree with most of that, personally

(but still don't really understand what:

'continuity is better than constant new managers'

means, particularly if you're not saying it was wrong to sack any of Worthy, Grant or Roeder.)

Suppose the only thing I'm not sure of is what we're accusing them of when we say they 'f*cked up our finances'. What did they actually do to f*ck them up, apart from deliver the managers the players they asked for?

But that may be because I haven't been following the many debates on this closely enough.

Posted By: Tricky Hawes, Mar 24, 15:55:32