this is one of those "why doesn't he do this" things
and if he does it, it won't be "that's good, nice one" it will be "about bloody time" or "if the average fan can spot that then what is he actually doing"
Rather than seeing it for what it is probably is, a deal to get a player from Luton, by offering them players that need 1st team games, and need to prove to Norwich if they can cut it
If Spillane is doing really good, then he's the one
I don't see why it all needs to be translated as eneptitude
Posted By: pants on December 17th 2008 at 11:24:10
Message Thread
- RE: Recalling Spillane (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Dec 17, 11:12:41
- Wha the fuck are you on about? (NCFC) - Yellalee, Dec 17, 11:17:54
- We will see.... If he rated him he woudl be here (n/m) (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Dec 17, 11:18:51
- But if he wanted bell over coventry in the transfer battle, he needed to dangle a carrot (NCFC) - pants, Dec 17, 11:20:48
- So because he wanted to beat Coventry to Bell he lent Spillane to Luton (NCFC) - Old Git, Dec 17, 11:28:34
- haha, I was going back to the circumstances at the time (NCFC) - pants, Dec 17, 11:37:51
- don't you start (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Dec 17, 11:30:53
- Didnt think of that, very good point! However, I still dont think he will play here under (n/m) (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Dec 17, 11:22:12
- GR (n/m) (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Dec 17, 11:22:22
- I'm loving the hype re spillane though (NCFC) - pants, Dec 17, 11:27:14
- no, it's not hype (NCFC) - Charles21, Dec 17, 11:29:57
- and soon we'll have no midfield (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 17, 11:28:00
- and god knows who we'll have up front in january! (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 17, 11:28:24
- Carl Cort dummy (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Dec 17, 11:30:07
- i don't want us relying on dummies (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 17, 11:30:56
- He did well at Marbella, he can raise up 3 leagues to us (NCFC) - pants, Dec 17, 11:58:14
- i don't want us relying on dummies (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 17, 11:30:56
- Carl Cort dummy (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Dec 17, 11:30:07
- and god knows who we'll have up front in january! (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 17, 11:28:24
- I'm loving the hype re spillane though (NCFC) - pants, Dec 17, 11:27:14
- GR (n/m) (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Dec 17, 11:22:22
- also, spillane is rubbish in puncarols (n/m) (NCFC) - Tombs, Dec 17, 11:21:54
- So because he wanted to beat Coventry to Bell he lent Spillane to Luton (NCFC) - Old Git, Dec 17, 11:28:34
- But if he wanted bell over coventry in the transfer battle, he needed to dangle a carrot (NCFC) - pants, Dec 17, 11:20:48
- We will see.... If he rated him he woudl be here (n/m) (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Dec 17, 11:18:51
- Off the record Delia said at the AGM to my brother that Spillane will (NCFC) - lovely old job, Dec 17, 11:14:40
- haha, leeds are trying their best to get Kandol back as he's nicely put (NCFC) - pants, Dec 17, 11:17:19
- that's still dumb tho (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 17, 11:13:58
- And if he comes back better, then it's worked (NCFC) - pants, Dec 17, 11:18:34
- yes i agree (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 17, 11:19:47
- this is one of those "why doesn't he do this" things (NCFC) - pants, Dec 17, 11:24:10
- it's not (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 17, 11:25:37
- If it's like Kandol at Leeds, then he's their player until a certain date (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Dec 17, 11:29:08
- no idea about leeds (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 17, 11:30:20
- i think it's fairly obvious that this is logical (NCFC) - Charles21, Dec 17, 11:33:31
- Not the point about agree or disagreeing. If we've loaned out a player (NCFC) - pants, Dec 17, 11:42:26
- well just want to know what the situation is (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 17, 11:54:00
- Ask your insider then (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Dec 17, 11:59:40
- yes, that's true (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Dec 17, 11:44:28
- well just want to know what the situation is (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 17, 11:54:00
- when i mentioned it saturday (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 17, 11:35:50
- Now you know what it's like to be me (NCFC) - pants, Dec 17, 11:46:40
- different people mug (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Dec 17, 11:39:26
- Not the point about agree or disagreeing. If we've loaned out a player (NCFC) - pants, Dec 17, 11:42:26
- i think it's fairly obvious that this is logical (NCFC) - Charles21, Dec 17, 11:33:31
- no idea about leeds (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 17, 11:30:20
- If it's like Kandol at Leeds, then he's their player until a certain date (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Dec 17, 11:29:08
- *ineptitude (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Dec 17, 11:24:34
- it's not (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 17, 11:25:37
- this is one of those "why doesn't he do this" things (NCFC) - pants, Dec 17, 11:24:10
- yes i agree (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 17, 11:19:47
- Roeder will never play him hes not one if his (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Dec 17, 11:15:44
- And if he comes back better, then it's worked (NCFC) - pants, Dec 17, 11:18:34
- Wha the fuck are you on about? (NCFC) - Yellalee, Dec 17, 11:17:54
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.