Oh and now i've read Waggers piece i'm off to top myself. Jesus that was depressing
"a light in their darkness"
Posted By: megson on December 3rd 2008 at 17:09:13
Message Thread
- MotherFuckingWaghorn latest (NCFC) - Yellalee, Dec 3, 16:09:15
- Good point well made... (NCFC) - Fierce Panda, Dec 3, 16:59:21
- another good article, what's your problem? (NCFC) - Chopper, Dec 3, 16:49:32
- Where, anywhere, did I say I had a problem with it? (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Dec 3, 16:50:36
- the thread title didn't sound overly supportive (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 3, 16:55:19
- MFW = MotherFuckingWaghorn (NCFC) - blindasabat, Dec 3, 17:04:46
- and why is this reserved for him? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 3, 17:07:11
- correct - it comes from Wagger referring to his own site as MFW (NCFC) - blindasabat, Dec 3, 17:10:48
- does he run the site? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 3, 17:13:07
- he does run it (n/m) (NCFC) - blindasabat, Dec 3, 17:17:32
- then my opinion of him (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 3, 17:19:00
- he does run it (n/m) (NCFC) - blindasabat, Dec 3, 17:17:32
- does he run the site? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 3, 17:13:07
- correct - it comes from Wagger referring to his own site as MFW (NCFC) - blindasabat, Dec 3, 17:10:48
- and why is this reserved for him? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 3, 17:07:11
- MFW = MotherFuckingWaghorn (NCFC) - blindasabat, Dec 3, 17:04:46
- the thread title didn't sound overly supportive (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 3, 16:55:19
- Where, anywhere, did I say I had a problem with it? (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Dec 3, 16:50:36
- MotherFuckingIrritating (NCFC) - Old Git, Dec 3, 16:18:59
- Point 3 is valid though, no? (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Dec 3, 16:21:23
- No (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Dec 3, 16:23:09
- Fine (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Dec 3, 16:24:09
- I'm sure it's right that Cullum is now waiting for the car crash (NCFC) - Old Git, Dec 3, 16:32:21
- From a rational, commercial viewpoint - agreed. But (NCFC) - Yellalee, Dec 3, 16:38:40
- No way (NCFC) - Old Git, Dec 3, 16:40:33
- Indeed - short term pain for long term gain (NCFC) - Yellalee, Dec 3, 16:43:45
- Except it won't be, as he's clearly stated the funds he'll put in are limited (NCFC) - megson, Dec 3, 17:02:35
- Oh and now i've read Waggers piece i'm off to top myself. Jesus that was depressing (NCFC) - megson, Dec 3, 17:09:13
- There's certainly a john madjeski style to him (NCFC) - pants, Dec 3, 17:08:21
- Except it won't be, as he's clearly stated the funds he'll put in are limited (NCFC) - megson, Dec 3, 17:02:35
- Indeed - short term pain for long term gain (NCFC) - Yellalee, Dec 3, 16:43:45
- No way (NCFC) - Old Git, Dec 3, 16:40:33
- From a rational, commercial viewpoint - agreed. But (NCFC) - Yellalee, Dec 3, 16:38:40
- I'm sure it's right that Cullum is now waiting for the car crash (NCFC) - Old Git, Dec 3, 16:32:21
- Fine (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Dec 3, 16:24:09
- No (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Dec 3, 16:23:09
- Point 3 is valid though, no? (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Dec 3, 16:21:23
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.