MotherFuckingIrritat ing
Point 1 - "society's uneasy, fearful mood haunts even our trips to Carrow Road. What was once supposed to be this release from the daily anxieties of life, now it merely compounds them as everything we hold dear comes under threat." = Rick's been on a "creative writing" course
Point 2 - "their butt in the air and their trousers down" = poi
Point 3 - "The manner in which Cullum just chips away at everyone's patience and resolve - without ever actually really saying what he intends - can start to gain a mischevious, if not malevolent air." = "Dear Neil, I wrote just what you asked, please may I have an interview with Gary now?"
Point 4 - "why if they can sweep Wolves away one week with such contemptuous ease, why can't they do it again against lesser mortals?" = because Wolves gifted us 3 goals and that doesn't happen most weeks. Get your head out of your arse.
HOWEVER - to be fair to him, he does advocate playing one of the kids, and I'm with him on that.
Posted By: Old Git on December 3rd 2008 at 16:18:59
Message Thread
- MotherFuckingWaghorn latest (NCFC) - Yellalee, Dec 3, 16:09:15
- Good point well made... (NCFC) - Fierce Panda, Dec 3, 16:59:21
- another good article, what's your problem? (NCFC) - Chopper, Dec 3, 16:49:32
- Where, anywhere, did I say I had a problem with it? (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Dec 3, 16:50:36
- the thread title didn't sound overly supportive (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 3, 16:55:19
- MFW = MotherFuckingWaghorn (NCFC) - blindasabat, Dec 3, 17:04:46
- and why is this reserved for him? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 3, 17:07:11
- correct - it comes from Wagger referring to his own site as MFW (NCFC) - blindasabat, Dec 3, 17:10:48
- does he run the site? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 3, 17:13:07
- he does run it (n/m) (NCFC) - blindasabat, Dec 3, 17:17:32
- then my opinion of him (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 3, 17:19:00
- he does run it (n/m) (NCFC) - blindasabat, Dec 3, 17:17:32
- does he run the site? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 3, 17:13:07
- correct - it comes from Wagger referring to his own site as MFW (NCFC) - blindasabat, Dec 3, 17:10:48
- and why is this reserved for him? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 3, 17:07:11
- MFW = MotherFuckingWaghorn (NCFC) - blindasabat, Dec 3, 17:04:46
- the thread title didn't sound overly supportive (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 3, 16:55:19
- Where, anywhere, did I say I had a problem with it? (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Dec 3, 16:50:36
- MotherFuckingIrritating (NCFC) - Old Git, Dec 3, 16:18:59
- Point 3 is valid though, no? (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Dec 3, 16:21:23
- No (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Dec 3, 16:23:09
- Fine (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Dec 3, 16:24:09
- I'm sure it's right that Cullum is now waiting for the car crash (NCFC) - Old Git, Dec 3, 16:32:21
- From a rational, commercial viewpoint - agreed. But (NCFC) - Yellalee, Dec 3, 16:38:40
- No way (NCFC) - Old Git, Dec 3, 16:40:33
- Indeed - short term pain for long term gain (NCFC) - Yellalee, Dec 3, 16:43:45
- Except it won't be, as he's clearly stated the funds he'll put in are limited (NCFC) - megson, Dec 3, 17:02:35
- Oh and now i've read Waggers piece i'm off to top myself. Jesus that was depressing (NCFC) - megson, Dec 3, 17:09:13
- There's certainly a john madjeski style to him (NCFC) - pants, Dec 3, 17:08:21
- Except it won't be, as he's clearly stated the funds he'll put in are limited (NCFC) - megson, Dec 3, 17:02:35
- Indeed - short term pain for long term gain (NCFC) - Yellalee, Dec 3, 16:43:45
- No way (NCFC) - Old Git, Dec 3, 16:40:33
- From a rational, commercial viewpoint - agreed. But (NCFC) - Yellalee, Dec 3, 16:38:40
- I'm sure it's right that Cullum is now waiting for the car crash (NCFC) - Old Git, Dec 3, 16:32:21
- Fine (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Dec 3, 16:24:09
- No (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Dec 3, 16:23:09
- Point 3 is valid though, no? (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Dec 3, 16:21:23
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.