Actually, based on attendances from last season, it would be:
Premier One
Manchester United 75,512
Arsenal 60,069
Newcastle United 48,976
Liverpool 43,680
Manchester City 41,983
Chelsea 41,629
Sunderland 41,440
Aston Villa 40,801
Everton 36,546
Tottenham Hotspur 36,069
West Ham United 32,831
Middlesbrough 30,125
Derby County 29,130
Stoke City 27,457
Sheffield United 26,209
West Bromwich Albion 26,201
Fulham 24,466
Hull City 24,403
Premier Two
Norwich City 24,095
Wolverhampton Wanderers 23,330
Blackburn Rovers 23,240
Leeds United 21,916
Ipswich Town 21,718
Bolton Wanderers 21,552
Charlton Athletic 21,080
Leicester City 20,246
Nottingham Forest 20,212
Birmingham City 20,145
Portsmouth 19,982
Reading 19,267
Cardiff City 19,031
Sheffield Wednesday 19,005
Coventry City 18,465
Wigan Athletic 18,077
Bristol City 17,087
Southampton 16,076
Notably not in:
Queens Park Rangers (ROFLtops)
Watford
Crystal Palace
Millwall
Posted By: Steve in Holland on November 3rd 2008 at 13:35:50
Message Thread
- For it or against it?.. (NCFC) - Fierce Panda, Nov 3, 13:27:35
- Why is the FA So Against Salary Caps? (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Nov 3, 13:45:03
- Because it could only work if every FIFA country implemented it at the same time (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Nov 3, 13:49:16
- Doesn't European law forbid it? (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Nov 3, 14:08:39
- they have one in Rugby League so presumably not (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Nov 3, 14:33:31
- That was unanimously agreed though, wasn't it? (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Nov 3, 14:39:04
- Phuq nose (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Nov 3, 14:13:08
- they have one in Rugby League so presumably not (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Nov 3, 14:33:31
- Doesn't European law forbid it? (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Nov 3, 14:08:39
- Arsenal 300m, Chelsea 700m and Man Utd 700m debts (NCFC) - pants, Nov 3, 13:47:05
- Because it could only work if every FIFA country implemented it at the same time (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Nov 3, 13:49:16
- Football is dead (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Nov 3, 13:41:24
- Nope I agree with him. Its what the modern game needs. (n/m) (NCFC) - Mick Jogger, Nov 3, 13:59:53
- Very poor (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Nov 3, 14:00:27
- AGAINST MOD?RN FOOTBALL (NCFC) - Nelsons final flanel, Nov 3, 13:57:28
- FOOTY'S DOOMED I TELL YE. (n/m) (NCFC) - DrDublin, Nov 3, 13:44:54
- Nope I agree with him. Its what the modern game needs. (n/m) (NCFC) - Mick Jogger, Nov 3, 13:59:53
- I am now desperate that Bolton get relegated. (n/m) (NCFC) - yarmyyarmy, Nov 3, 13:40:47
- What on earth could have attracted the Bolton Chairman to a "no relegation" plan? (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Nov 3, 13:44:15
- And anyway it won't happen (NCFC) - yarmyyarmy, Nov 3, 13:43:11
- Depends how they "share" it (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Nov 3, 13:44:40
- against!! Whats the point in football if theres no highs or lows! (n/m) (NCFC) - Thomo, Nov 3, 13:39:35
- Depends if we are in it or not (n/m) (NCFC) - Brom, Nov 3, 13:35:35
- Strongly against, but what will be will be. (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Nov 3, 13:34:59
- against (NCFC) - blindasabat, Nov 3, 13:34:00
- I'm so against it, it might be the final straw with me (NCFC) - Brandonio, Nov 3, 13:32:20
- Like skinny trousers and terrible indie bands (n/m) (NCFC) - Mick Jogger, Nov 3, 14:00:23
- agreed mate. That would be the final straw for me and maybe (NCFC) - Superstar D J, Nov 3, 13:48:22
- Get yourself into Korfball mate, there's a few teams round Norwich. (n/m) (NCFC) - sheffieldcanary, Nov 3, 14:02:31
- Netball for even bigger girls (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Nov 3, 14:13:26
- No, netball with big girls and girls! (n/m) (NCFC) - sheffieldcanary, Nov 3, 16:07:40
- Rugby: fat blokes playing catch. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Nov 3, 14:18:10
- Netball for even bigger girls (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Nov 3, 14:13:26
- Get yourself into Korfball mate, there's a few teams round Norwich. (n/m) (NCFC) - sheffieldcanary, Nov 3, 14:02:31
- Agreed. I'd support Norwich in it but I'd be pretty appalled. (NCFC) - sheffieldcanary, Nov 3, 13:36:48
- That is an absolutely disgusting idea (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Nov 3, 13:31:37
- Against! (n/m) (NCFC) - EtuWHO, Nov 3, 13:31:07
- Against (n/m) (NCFC) - wgf500, Nov 3, 13:30:10
- against (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Nov 3, 13:28:58
- agin (n/m) (NCFC) - malkybarkid, Nov 3, 13:28:04
- For it or against it? (n/m) (NCFC) - Fierce Panda, Nov 3, 13:30:44
- Against - but with 2 caveats (NCFC) - Jambocanary, Nov 3, 13:30:36
- Actually, based on attendances from last season, it would be: (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Nov 3, 13:35:50
- so your saying stoke averaged 27000 last season? (NCFC) - Disshater, Nov 3, 18:30:57
- Quick, sell another 309 season tickets!! (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Nov 3, 13:41:15
- But it won't go on attendances... (NCFC) - Brom, Nov 3, 13:40:02
- We would get in, as would the Scum. Here's my guess on the ins and outs: (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Nov 3, 13:48:01
- But it could easily be us who are not considered, as you can see from my hopeful guess (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Nov 3, 13:48:26
- We would get in, as would the Scum. Here's my guess on the ins and outs: (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Nov 3, 13:48:01
- Actually, based on attendances from last season, it would be: (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Nov 3, 13:35:50
- Why is the FA So Against Salary Caps? (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Nov 3, 13:45:03
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.