I saw the substitution of Croft a strategic one.

He tends to run left-backs ragged throughout the game. Let him tire them out and bring a fresh pair of legs on towards the end of the game to take the advantage. This showed as Bell was able to get round the full-back and get some decent balls in. I think the decision is a tactical one and nothing against Crofty's ability or effort during the game.

But if the boo-boys want to boo they'll invent a reason for it.

Posted By: Ken Dodds Dads Dog on October 27th 2008 at 09:26:07


Message Thread


Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.

Log in