he was playing with s**te players much of last season

then he was frozen out for a loanee.

and the new hero to replace him has also been frozen out.

the one player who can turn games and we get rid.

Posted By: SCC 28 on October 19th 2008 at 14:36:20

Message Thread

Looking at the table, 18, 19, 20, 21 - (NCFC) - CB41, Oct 19, 12:28:10
- Maybe, I'd like to think in a crisis we could all stick it out (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 14:05:40
  - because things will turn around how? (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 19, 14:09:22
    - When we play better. Derby have turned it around, and many on here (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 14:15:38
  - Roeder is one of the best things we have going (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Oct 19, 14:06:59
    - in what way? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 19, 14:12:30
      - Who would come here knowing the knives are out after less than a season? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 14:16:50
      - Without Him (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Oct 19, 14:16:28
        
        Lupoli never plays (NCFC) - Holden Caulfield, Oct 19, 15:27:28
        
        you know that for a fact? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 19, 14:31:08
        
        You okay with us having very poor results when Huckerby did play? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 14:33:22
        
        he was playing with shite players much of last season (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 19, 14:36:20
        
        Huckerby apologist (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 14:38:08
        
        Without Roeder we'd be in league one, fact (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 14:22:12
        
        so was getting rid of hucks a good idea? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 19, 14:34:12
        
        He wasn't playing well enough. The mls is joke (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 14:38:47
        
        Is that why Beckham is still good enough for England? (NCFC) - Holden Caulfield, Oct 19, 15:34:13
        
        Considering the slating Capello would get if he wasn't picked (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 16:17:02
        
        cos the sweaties we sign (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 19, 16:18:51
        
        Like bobinson (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 16:23:38
        
        to get in our team? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 19, 14:41:15
        
        I saw him do nothing (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 14:48:17
        
        1 game!!! (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 19, 14:49:14
        
        Ignoring the general facts again (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 14:52:20
        
        You are really aren't you? (NCFC) - Holden Caulfield, Oct 19, 15:35:18
        
        thing is strap on sally, you've never liked me (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 16:18:42
        
        That's double dutch to me (n/m) (NCFC) - Holden Caulfield, Oct 19, 16:32:45
        
        I Assume (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Oct 19, 14:25:23
      - 6 wins in 26 i think i heard yesterday (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 19, 14:13:50
        
        I've heard you the last 3 seasons babbling on about going to support someone else (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 14:17:32
        
        wtf (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 19, 14:30:25
    - We're about 2-3 bad results away from turning on him completely (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 14:08:46
      - you mean get rid of our best player? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 19, 14:11:14
        
        Said player who wasn't an intergral part of our decent results last season? (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 14:18:48
        
        you have no idea because you don't watch us (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 19, 14:38:02
        
        I'm dealing with someone who likes using stats to slag this club off (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 14:43:47
        
        but still attends games (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 19, 14:46:06
        
        I still attend games (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 14:49:16
        
        when someone offers you a free lift? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 19, 14:50:45
        
        poor trolling, wp (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 14:53:17
        
        although, not poor as (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 15:00:53
        
        it's a question (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 19, 15:02:04
        
        yes deary (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 15:07:55
        
        ffs (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 19, 14:38:56
- 1,2,3,5 (NCFC) - yarmyyarmy, Oct 19, 13:49:20
- Club Apologist Excuse Number 133 (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Oct 19, 13:42:31
  - why do people like roeder? (NCFC) - colinsuggettsafro, Oct 19, 14:23:47
    - Cos the backroom staff have all been a roaring success based on merit? (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 14:31:53
    - It's not a question of liking Roeder (NCFC) - Reg Presley, Oct 19, 14:31:39
    - Actually, I'm not sure I particulary like what he says. (NCFC) - yarmyyarmy, Oct 19, 14:30:09
      - This is it, It's no different to any other poor start. We just need to ride it (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 14:35:24
  - club apologist appears to be the next band wagon slogan (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 14:23:47
    - No Different (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Oct 19, 14:28:16
      - haha, fair do's I guess (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 16:44:24
  - Heaven knows, I'm miserable now. (n/m) (NCFC) - yarmyyarmy, Oct 19, 14:10:06
  - the club is not run by the Smiths (NCFC) - Jethmeister, Oct 19, 14:00:26
    - The board sets out the policies and objectives (NCFC) - Reg Presley, Oct 19, 14:15:18
    - And They Answer to Who? (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Oct 19, 14:05:44
      - what decisions do you disagree with that you think they made? (n/m) (NCFC) - Jethmeister, Oct 19, 14:16:29
        
        It's What They Didn't Do (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Oct 19, 14:20:28
- Funny thing about that (NCFC) - Reg Presley, Oct 19, 13:09:29
  - Certainly Ipswich and Soton, but Charlton? (NCFC) - yarmyyarmy, Oct 19, 14:06:36
    - Well... (NCFC) - Reg Presley, Oct 19, 14:10:07
      - Suppose so, but Dowie must have seemed like a decent acquisition at the time (NCFC) - yarmyyarmy, Oct 19, 14:22:47
        
        Dowie is perhaps excusable (NCFC) - Reg Presley, Oct 19, 14:30:15

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.