Said player who wasn't an intergral part of our decent results last season?

Yet it's made out if he was here we'd be terrorising this division

Even though the facts speak for themselves

Posted By: pants on October 19th 2008 at 14:18:48

Message Thread

Looking at the table, 18, 19, 20, 21 - (NCFC) - CB41, Oct 19, 12:28:10
- Maybe, I'd like to think in a crisis we could all stick it out (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 14:05:40
  - because things will turn around how? (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 19, 14:09:22
    - When we play better. Derby have turned it around, and many on here (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 14:15:38
  - Roeder is one of the best things we have going (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Oct 19, 14:06:59
    - in what way? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 19, 14:12:30
      - Who would come here knowing the knives are out after less than a season? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 14:16:50
      - Without Him (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Oct 19, 14:16:28
        
        Lupoli never plays (NCFC) - Holden Caulfield, Oct 19, 15:27:28
        
        you know that for a fact? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 19, 14:31:08
        
        You okay with us having very poor results when Huckerby did play? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 14:33:22
        
        he was playing with shite players much of last season (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 19, 14:36:20
        
        Huckerby apologist (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 14:38:08
        
        Without Roeder we'd be in league one, fact (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 14:22:12
        
        so was getting rid of hucks a good idea? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 19, 14:34:12
        
        He wasn't playing well enough. The mls is joke (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 14:38:47
        
        Is that why Beckham is still good enough for England? (NCFC) - Holden Caulfield, Oct 19, 15:34:13
        
        Considering the slating Capello would get if he wasn't picked (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 16:17:02
        
        cos the sweaties we sign (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 19, 16:18:51
        
        Like bobinson (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 16:23:38
        
        to get in our team? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 19, 14:41:15
        
        I saw him do nothing (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 14:48:17
        
        1 game!!! (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 19, 14:49:14
        
        Ignoring the general facts again (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 14:52:20
        
        You are really aren't you? (NCFC) - Holden Caulfield, Oct 19, 15:35:18
        
        thing is strap on sally, you've never liked me (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 16:18:42
        
        That's double dutch to me (n/m) (NCFC) - Holden Caulfield, Oct 19, 16:32:45
        
        I Assume (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Oct 19, 14:25:23
      - 6 wins in 26 i think i heard yesterday (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 19, 14:13:50
        
        I've heard you the last 3 seasons babbling on about going to support someone else (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 14:17:32
        
        wtf (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 19, 14:30:25
    - We're about 2-3 bad results away from turning on him completely (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 14:08:46
      - you mean get rid of our best player? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 19, 14:11:14
        
        Said player who wasn't an intergral part of our decent results last season? (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 14:18:48
        
        you have no idea because you don't watch us (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 19, 14:38:02
        
        I'm dealing with someone who likes using stats to slag this club off (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 14:43:47
        
        but still attends games (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 19, 14:46:06
        
        I still attend games (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 14:49:16
        
        when someone offers you a free lift? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 19, 14:50:45
        
        poor trolling, wp (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 14:53:17
        
        although, not poor as (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 15:00:53
        
        it's a question (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 19, 15:02:04
        
        yes deary (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 15:07:55
        
        ffs (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 19, 14:38:56
- 1,2,3,5 (NCFC) - yarmyyarmy, Oct 19, 13:49:20
- Club Apologist Excuse Number 133 (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Oct 19, 13:42:31
  - why do people like roeder? (NCFC) - colinsuggettsafro, Oct 19, 14:23:47
    - Cos the backroom staff have all been a roaring success based on merit? (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 14:31:53
    - It's not a question of liking Roeder (NCFC) - Reg Presley, Oct 19, 14:31:39
    - Actually, I'm not sure I particulary like what he says. (NCFC) - yarmyyarmy, Oct 19, 14:30:09
      - This is it, It's no different to any other poor start. We just need to ride it (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 14:35:24
  - club apologist appears to be the next band wagon slogan (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 14:23:47
    - No Different (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Oct 19, 14:28:16
      - haha, fair do's I guess (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 16:44:24
  - Heaven knows, I'm miserable now. (n/m) (NCFC) - yarmyyarmy, Oct 19, 14:10:06
  - the club is not run by the Smiths (NCFC) - Jethmeister, Oct 19, 14:00:26
    - The board sets out the policies and objectives (NCFC) - Reg Presley, Oct 19, 14:15:18
    - And They Answer to Who? (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Oct 19, 14:05:44
      - what decisions do you disagree with that you think they made? (n/m) (NCFC) - Jethmeister, Oct 19, 14:16:29
        
        It's What They Didn't Do (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Oct 19, 14:20:28
- Funny thing about that (NCFC) - Reg Presley, Oct 19, 13:09:29
  - Certainly Ipswich and Soton, but Charlton? (NCFC) - yarmyyarmy, Oct 19, 14:06:36
    - Well... (NCFC) - Reg Presley, Oct 19, 14:10:07
      - Suppose so, but Dowie must have seemed like a decent acquisition at the time (NCFC) - yarmyyarmy, Oct 19, 14:22:47
        
        Dowie is perhaps excusable (NCFC) - Reg Presley, Oct 19, 14:30:15

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.