Exactly! Was thinking about the linesman too...
...although the one that was replaced was on the City stand side and so the fourth official wasn't involved in the penalty decision at all.
Still, blindasabat could be right. After all, this ( User Posted Link ) does look like a logical way to prevent a striker scoring considering the player committing the offence is ALLOWED TO USE HIS HANDS!
Posted By: Declan on October 17th 2008 at 11:07:22
Message Thread
- So it turns out that the money was going on Norwich winning, therefore finger of suspicion (NCFC) - Old Git, Oct 17, 10:25:39
- only if you can convince me that by doing everything he could to prevent Lita from walking (NCFC) - blindasabat, Oct 17, 10:32:49
- Surely he'd have a better chance of influencing the game (NCFC) - Holden Caulfield, Oct 17, 10:55:25
- not according to OG he's not... (n/m) (NCFC) - blindasabat, Oct 17, 10:58:45
- FFS give it up man! (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 17, 10:41:45
- well can you explain it? (NCFC) - blindasabat, Oct 17, 10:48:27
- My mates at the agme all said (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 17, 11:06:39
- sorry, but that doesn't tally with the highlights on the OS (NCFC) - blindasabat, Oct 17, 11:19:14
- Surely the short point is (NCFC) - Old Git, Oct 17, 11:18:30
- no... (NCFC) - blindasabat, Oct 17, 11:23:46
- Given that we hadn't threatened a shot on target at that point... (NCFC) - Declan, Oct 17, 10:51:16
- And given that those who were at the game (unlike blinders) thought Lita had (NCFC) - Old Git, Oct 17, 10:53:29
- Exactly! Was thinking about the linesman too... (NCFC) - Declan, Oct 17, 11:07:22
- I said that at the time, could not understand the use of the foot, when (NCFC) - megson, Oct 17, 11:21:16
- And looking at that picture... (NCFC) - Declan, Oct 17, 11:13:26
- Fuckan wars. Nice pic. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Oct 17, 11:11:04
- Kin Ada! (NCFC) - Old Git, Oct 17, 11:10:20
- Exactly! Was thinking about the linesman too... (NCFC) - Declan, Oct 17, 11:07:22
- And given that those who were at the game (unlike blinders) thought Lita had (NCFC) - Old Git, Oct 17, 10:53:29
- My mates at the agme all said (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 17, 11:06:39
- He won't, blinders has no reverse gear (NCFC) - Old Git, Oct 17, 10:43:42
- i'll take that as a no then shall i? (n/m) (NCFC) - blindasabat, Oct 17, 10:48:52
- well can you explain it? (NCFC) - blindasabat, Oct 17, 10:48:27
- Surely he'd have a better chance of influencing the game (NCFC) - Holden Caulfield, Oct 17, 10:55:25
- Or, according to this guy, the officials! (NCFC) - Stoopish, Oct 17, 10:29:40
- well, not so much but it's a thought (n/m) (NCFC) - capecodcarman, Oct 17, 10:32:12
- quack-tastic (n/m) (NCFC) - Stoopish, Oct 17, 10:32:59
- well, not so much but it's a thought (n/m) (NCFC) - Stoopish, Oct 17, 10:30:47
- well, not so much but it's a thought (n/m) (NCFC) - Stoopish, Oct 17, 10:30:47
- well, not so much but it's a thought (n/m) (NCFC) - capecodcarman, Oct 17, 10:32:12
- only if you can convince me that by doing everything he could to prevent Lita from walking (NCFC) - blindasabat, Oct 17, 10:32:49
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.