Aren't officials finances scrutinised?

as in the case of Clattenburg. Must say a ref would be my first choice - and I've seen plenty of matches where it wouldn't have surprised me to hear that an official was on the take. Wouldn't say that about that Derby game.

Posted By: Reg Presley on October 16th 2008 at 21:57:21

Message Thread

So are we saying (NCFC) - Reg Presley, Oct 16, 21:47:49
- No, the reason there's a possible investigation (NCFC) - Fozzybear, Oct 16, 21:59:14
  - Didn't know you could bet on (NCFC) - Charles21, Oct 16, 22:02:34
  - Like shooting fish in a barrel (n/m) (NCFC) - Reg Presley, Oct 16, 22:02:22
  - it wasn't a penalty market being played (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 16, 22:01:40
- Nah... (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Oct 16, 21:57:16
- People must have been in on it. I blame the River-end, mark my words they knew, oh yes. (n/m) (NCFC) - DrDublin, Oct 16, 21:53:20
  - I admit it, irregularities started when I arrived at my seat before kick off, at this (NCFC) - lovely old job, Oct 16, 22:02:15
    - I sensed a gathering at that end when the gates opened, knew they were involved. (n/m) (NCFC) - DrDublin, Oct 16, 22:05:23
- Something that occurs to me (NCFC) - Iwan Husarmi, Oct 16, 21:51:06
  - Aren't officials finances scrutinised? (NCFC) - Reg Presley, Oct 16, 21:57:21
  - It's not necessarily about a final result though (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Oct 16, 21:56:30
  - Yes (NCFC) - Reg Presley, Oct 16, 21:53:17
- pretty much! (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 16, 21:50:35
- lol (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Oct 16, 21:48:05

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.