Dunno

From a digital reproduction point of view, not much I guess. Some reckon that most people can't tell the difference above 320 kbits MP3 compared to the original CD anyway.

.wma is a Microsoft format though and therefore you'll probably find it easier to play than .flac

Posted By: BerlinCanary on August 27th 2008 at 16:07:34

Message Thread

FAO Berlin (General Chat) - Reg Presley, Aug 27, 16:03:24
- Dunno (General Chat) - BerlinCanary, Aug 27, 16:07:34
  - Nah (General Chat) - Reg Presley, Aug 27, 16:17:46
    - I'd go for FLAC then (n/m) (General Chat) - BerlinCanary, Aug 27, 16:24:48
- flac is better for sharing - more native support in linuxes and macs. (General Chat) - Arizona Bay, Aug 27, 16:06:51
  - What plays FLAC on the Mac? (General Chat) - BerlinCanary, Aug 27, 16:08:59
    - This says "Mac OS X" (General Chat) - Arizona Bay, Aug 27, 16:14:06
    - Dunno - just assumed someone would have done a player. (General Chat) - Arizona Bay, Aug 27, 16:09:39
      - Yeah, think so (General Chat) - BerlinCanary, Aug 27, 16:14:14
        
        Quite. (General Chat) - Arizona Bay, Aug 27, 16:15:33
  - you might know how to spell fao but you don't know what it means (General Chat) - camcan, Aug 27, 16:07:50
- lossless .wma is an oxymoron. vinyl is best. (n/m) (General Chat) - cookpassbabtridge, Aug 27, 16:06:12

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.