FAO Berlin
What is "better"? a lossless .wma or a .flac?
Posted By: Reg Presley on August 27th 2008 at 16:03:24
Message Thread
- FAO Berlin (General Chat) - Reg Presley, Aug 27, 16:03:24
- Dunno (General Chat) - BerlinCanary, Aug 27, 16:07:34
- Nah (General Chat) - Reg Presley, Aug 27, 16:17:46
- I'd go for FLAC then (n/m) (General Chat) - BerlinCanary, Aug 27, 16:24:48
- Nah (General Chat) - Reg Presley, Aug 27, 16:17:46
- flac is better for sharing - more native support in linuxes and macs. (General Chat) - Arizona Bay, Aug 27, 16:06:51
- What plays FLAC on the Mac? (General Chat) - BerlinCanary, Aug 27, 16:08:59
- This says "Mac OS X" (General Chat) - Arizona Bay, Aug 27, 16:14:06
- Dunno - just assumed someone would have done a player. (General Chat) - Arizona Bay, Aug 27, 16:09:39
- Yeah, think so (General Chat) - BerlinCanary, Aug 27, 16:14:14
- Quite. (General Chat) - Arizona Bay, Aug 27, 16:15:33
- Yeah, think so (General Chat) - BerlinCanary, Aug 27, 16:14:14
- you might know how to spell fao but you don't know what it means (General Chat) - camcan, Aug 27, 16:07:50
- What plays FLAC on the Mac? (General Chat) - BerlinCanary, Aug 27, 16:08:59
- lossless .wma is an oxymoron. vinyl is best. (n/m) (General Chat) - cookpassbabtridge, Aug 27, 16:06:12
- Dunno (General Chat) - BerlinCanary, Aug 27, 16:07:34
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.