yeah, usually. No reason why they have to be, but

I'd guess that Waggers is right and the Standard didn't check their facts properly.

Fwiw, would also guess that this won't happen at all, given Wet Sham have already sold Zamora. Hope I'm wrong though.

Posted By: Tricky Hawes on August 6th 2008 at 17:41:32

Message Thread

Waggers has got the Standard, too (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Aug 6, 17:19:25
- I got it to 1.5m, guessing 20% of 7.5 (NCFC) - pants, Aug 6, 17:45:14
- clauses are usually on profit (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 6, 17:24:12
- how much did we sell Ashton for? (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Aug 6, 17:23:18
  - Dunno, but according to Doncaster (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Aug 6, 17:48:25
    - haha (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Aug 6, 17:51:32
      - Big nasty West Ham negotiated the shit out of our doddery board (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Aug 6, 17:53:50
  - 7.5 (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Aug 6, 17:26:51
    - So, should he actually be sold for 20mn, then we'd get (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Aug 6, 17:51:35
- Isn't that how sell on's are usually quoted? (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, Aug 6, 17:22:21
  - yeah, usually. No reason why they have to be, but (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Aug 6, 17:41:32

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.