Waggers has got the Standard, too

User Posted Link

He's talking about ?1.5m rather than ?3m, so either: (a) his maths is *really* bad, and he things that 15% of 20m is 1.5m, or
(b) he thinks that the Standard have got their facts wrong, and the clause is 15% of any profit West Ham make.

Sadly suspect both that (b) is correct, and that he's right, too.

Posted By: Tricky Hawes on August 6th 2008 at 17:19:25

Message Thread

Waggers has got the Standard, too (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Aug 6, 17:19:25
- I got it to 1.5m, guessing 20% of 7.5 (NCFC) - pants, Aug 6, 17:45:14
- clauses are usually on profit (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 6, 17:24:12
- how much did we sell Ashton for? (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Aug 6, 17:23:18
  - Dunno, but according to Doncaster (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Aug 6, 17:48:25
    - haha (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Aug 6, 17:51:32
      - Big nasty West Ham negotiated the shit out of our doddery board (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Aug 6, 17:53:50
  - 7.5 (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Aug 6, 17:26:51
    - So, should he actually be sold for 20mn, then we'd get (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Aug 6, 17:51:35
- Isn't that how sell on's are usually quoted? (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, Aug 6, 17:22:21
  - yeah, usually. No reason why they have to be, but (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Aug 6, 17:41:32

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.