I think we batted for too long - that was the error, not the follow-on decision

We should have had more of a bowl at them on Saturday evening - as far as I could see, the only reason we batted so long was for Bell to get his 200 - that's over-sentimental captaincy (which Vaughan has been guilty of before).

Posted By: Tricky Hawes on July 14th 2008 at 10:38:28

Message Thread

Fellow Cricgol lovers, answer me this (Other Sports) - meggers, Jul 14, 09:16:11
- Yebbut, I thought we should not have enforced the follow on we should have used which ever (Other Sports) - lovely old job, Jul 14, 09:23:07
  - Good point, hadn't thought of that. (Other Sports) - megson, Jul 14, 10:34:06
    - I think we batted for too long - that was the error, not the follow-on decision (Other Sports) - Tricky Hawes, Jul 14, 10:38:28
      - Yes, had you popped on here friday you'd have seen me get more and more annoyed! (Other Sports) - megson, Jul 14, 10:55:43
- Gets on my wick too. As I mentioned before, the only department we are superior to the (Other Sports) - jafski, Jul 14, 09:21:45
  - YEs, frustrating that. (n/m) (Other Sports) - megson, Jul 14, 10:29:56

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.