what are Croft and Chadwick for then?

Posted By: Tricky Hawes on June 18th 2008 at 10:18:02

Message Thread

Apparantly we're trying to nick McCourt of WB (n/m) (NCFC) - steven, Jun 18, 09:55:27
- Sounds like a good player... (NCFC) - Dog, Jun 18, 10:14:57
  - Plus we've got Croft Chadwick and of course Eddie! (n/m) (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Jun 18, 10:18:25
  - what are Croft and Chadwick for then? (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jun 18, 10:18:02
    - Yeah... (NCFC) - Dog, Jun 18, 10:20:44
      - You can't 'discount Patty because he's a squad player' (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jun 18, 10:24:46
        
        And furthermore... (NCFC) - Dog, Jun 18, 10:27:54
        
        You could class Eagle as left-back cover, and Patty as CM cover. (NCFC) - Dog, Jun 18, 10:27:18
        
        apparently hoolahoop can play CM a bit too... (NCFC) - steven, Jun 18, 10:29:17
        
        So, midfield would be... (NCFC) - Dog, Jun 18, 10:34:29
- Isn't he the one we had on trial 2/3 seasons ago from Rochdale? (n/m) (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Jun 18, 10:05:26
  - Yep (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jun 18, 10:14:11
- Link (NCFC) - steven, Jun 18, 09:55:59
  - If true, then surely more evidence that the Hoolahan deal has indeed broken down (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jun 18, 10:01:23
    - but if hoolahan signed before he went on holiday, how can the deal 'break down'? (NCFC) - Dave in France, Jun 18, 10:06:14
      - and why do you think he signed before he went on holiday? (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jun 18, 10:17:22
        
        rumours isn't an exact science you know (n/m) (NCFC) - Dave in France, Jun 18, 10:24:11
        
        that's for sure (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jun 18, 10:26:34
        
        I think Hoolahan has signed simply because.. (NCFC) - loz, Jun 18, 10:23:32

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.