when the successful formation Roeder had created

would have had Bertrand LB and Pattison slot in at left midfield, if Camara was injured. thus keeping the side solid

Posted By: phrankin on June 12th 2008 at 13:38:51

Message Thread

Tinkering according to Phrankin (NCFC) - pants, Jun 12, 13:00:56
- What point are you trying to make because is Phrankin's point was (NCFC) - Jim, Jun 12, 13:08:06
  - He had to because Taylor had gone, that is very obvious (NCFC) - pants, Jun 12, 13:11:34
    - BULLSHIT (NCFC) - phrankin, Jun 12, 13:18:05
      - on another note, camara played 12/13 games in the unbeaten run, then when dropped... (NCFC) - Tony Martin, Jun 12, 13:24:45
        
        and why did Camara get dropped? (NCFC) - mr carra, Jun 12, 13:33:42
        
        cos Roeder's a BASTARD (NCFC) - pants, Jun 12, 14:51:48
        
        precisely, meaning we were exposed down the left far too easily (n/m) (NCFC) - Tony Martin, Jun 12, 13:35:48
        
        when the successful formation Roeder had created (NCFC) - phrankin, Jun 12, 13:38:51
        
        Thus illustrating (a) the problem of Hucks and (b) the problem of having to play Bertrand (NCFC) - Old Git, Jun 12, 13:38:26
        
        That is true (NCFC) - Old Git, Jun 12, 13:26:53
        
        i did too, although his crossing is poor, he is a very solid left back (NCFC) - Tony Martin, Jun 12, 13:28:56
        
        Yes (NCFC) - Old Git, Jun 12, 13:31:02
  - Anyone who saw the games would agree... (n/m) (NCFC) - HoofinHughes, Jun 12, 13:11:16
  - thing is - Roeder just started to try a few things out (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jun 12, 13:10:52
    - Didn't we lose 4-1 to Leicester before he starting "tinkering" as you all put it? (NCFC) - LincolnshireCanary, Jun 12, 13:21:31
      - My thoughts exactly (NCFC) - pants, Jun 12, 13:24:13
      - NO....Leicester and Hull were the first (NCFC) - phrankin, Jun 12, 13:22:26
        
        Hull home started the huckerby backlash, cos gibbs played (NCFC) - pants, Jun 12, 13:27:37
        
        Oh f*ck off! You really are showing up the fact you don't watch us here (NCFC) - Jim, Jun 12, 13:49:03
        
        Huckerby had an injection before leicester and didn't make the team (NCFC) - pants, Jun 12, 14:43:56
        
        Is that true - I don't think so. (NCFC) - phrankin, Jun 12, 15:07:21
        
        Yes gibbs played and was poor (NCFC) - phrankin, Jun 12, 13:32:33
    - I'll agree with that I suppose. A lot of those results aren't a surprise though (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jun 12, 13:12:54
- Sheffield actually scored an onside goal against us at carrow road (NCFC) - phrankin, Jun 12, 13:05:20
  - hahahahaha (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jun 12, 13:07:35
    - you brought up a refereeing error. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Jun 12, 13:08:54
- What vendetta arising from some long ago post are you pursuing here, pants? (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Jun 12, 13:04:33
  - vendetta? (NCFC) - pants, Jun 12, 13:06:24
    - NIT PICKING (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jun 12, 13:11:31
      - If only I could think of a Japanese player getting selected in England (NCFC) - Old Git, Jun 12, 13:14:10
        
        been a few racist remarks on here (NCFC) - pants, Jun 12, 13:16:17
      - Nitty Nora! (n/m) (NCFC) - Garry Brooke, Jun 12, 13:12:55
      - I like nip picking (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jun 12, 13:11:59
    - yeah and my initial post was about ambition in the boardroom (NCFC) - phrankin, Jun 12, 13:07:29
      - because you hack at this club at any opportunity (NCFC) - pants, Jun 12, 13:09:09
- Don't forget (NCFC) - phrankin, Jun 12, 13:04:02
  - fair enough (NCFC) - pants, Jun 12, 13:04:50
  - that form over a full season is 23rd position (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Jun 12, 13:04:25
    - It would mean unbeaten at home with 45pts... (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jun 12, 13:08:32
      - you have to include my 3 games with pants 12. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Jun 12, 13:10:36
      - im just stating a fact that the last 15 games after all the tinkering (NCFC) - phrankin, Jun 12, 13:10:16
        
        but that's being selective - our 15 games before that were (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jun 12, 13:12:33
        
        Isn't the point that we had a settled looking team which was performing its socks off (NCFC) - Old Git, Jun 12, 13:17:10
        
        It kind of shows that we only have faith in managers when we're 13 games unbeaten (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jun 12, 13:20:45
        
        Yes but that is the point... WHen the tinkering with personell (NCFC) - phrankin, Jun 12, 13:14:30
        
        All this is telling me is you'll turn on Roeder next season at the first opportunity (NCFC) - pants, Jun 12, 13:18:59
        
        go have a wank (NCFC) - lurd, Jun 12, 13:16:22
        
        Yeh and we stayed up. Like I say Roeder's error if anything (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jun 12, 13:16:21
        
        I think he did a brilliant job keeping us up (NCFC) - phrankin, Jun 12, 13:19:35
        
        Maybe if you didn't grumble so much during the bad patch (NCFC) - pants, Jun 12, 13:22:33
        
        Grumble... like leicester away when I moaned that Henry was left wing Croft right (NCFC) - phrankin, Jun 12, 13:27:47
        
        hahahaa more slagging off (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jun 12, 13:29:15
        
        No... THE SAME QUESTIONNING AS I DID AT THE TIME (NCFC) - phrankin, Jun 12, 13:31:23
        
        No-one forgets that (NCFC) - Old Git, Jun 12, 13:18:37
        
        FFS - I was the main person saying that for the last few games of the season! (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jun 12, 13:28:29

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.