No... THE SAME QUESTIONNING AS I DID AT THE TIME

my opinion of these selections will not change.

WHICH was the WHOLE POINT of this argument. STUPID selections and NEEDLESS CHANGES. WHich IMO affected our form to a point that we went from top 6 form to relegation form.

Posted By: phrankin on June 12th 2008 at 13:31:23

Message Thread

Tinkering according to Phrankin (NCFC) - pants, Jun 12, 13:00:56
- What point are you trying to make because is Phrankin's point was (NCFC) - Jim, Jun 12, 13:08:06
  - He had to because Taylor had gone, that is very obvious (NCFC) - pants, Jun 12, 13:11:34
    - BULLSHIT (NCFC) - phrankin, Jun 12, 13:18:05
      - on another note, camara played 12/13 games in the unbeaten run, then when dropped... (NCFC) - Tony Martin, Jun 12, 13:24:45
        
        and why did Camara get dropped? (NCFC) - mr carra, Jun 12, 13:33:42
        
        cos Roeder's a BASTARD (NCFC) - pants, Jun 12, 14:51:48
        
        precisely, meaning we were exposed down the left far too easily (n/m) (NCFC) - Tony Martin, Jun 12, 13:35:48
        
        when the successful formation Roeder had created (NCFC) - phrankin, Jun 12, 13:38:51
        
        Thus illustrating (a) the problem of Hucks and (b) the problem of having to play Bertrand (NCFC) - Old Git, Jun 12, 13:38:26
        
        That is true (NCFC) - Old Git, Jun 12, 13:26:53
        
        i did too, although his crossing is poor, he is a very solid left back (NCFC) - Tony Martin, Jun 12, 13:28:56
        
        Yes (NCFC) - Old Git, Jun 12, 13:31:02
  - Anyone who saw the games would agree... (n/m) (NCFC) - HoofinHughes, Jun 12, 13:11:16
  - thing is - Roeder just started to try a few things out (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jun 12, 13:10:52
    - Didn't we lose 4-1 to Leicester before he starting "tinkering" as you all put it? (NCFC) - LincolnshireCanary, Jun 12, 13:21:31
      - My thoughts exactly (NCFC) - pants, Jun 12, 13:24:13
      - NO....Leicester and Hull were the first (NCFC) - phrankin, Jun 12, 13:22:26
        
        Hull home started the huckerby backlash, cos gibbs played (NCFC) - pants, Jun 12, 13:27:37
        
        Oh f*ck off! You really are showing up the fact you don't watch us here (NCFC) - Jim, Jun 12, 13:49:03
        
        Huckerby had an injection before leicester and didn't make the team (NCFC) - pants, Jun 12, 14:43:56
        
        Is that true - I don't think so. (NCFC) - phrankin, Jun 12, 15:07:21
        
        Yes gibbs played and was poor (NCFC) - phrankin, Jun 12, 13:32:33
    - I'll agree with that I suppose. A lot of those results aren't a surprise though (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jun 12, 13:12:54
- Sheffield actually scored an onside goal against us at carrow road (NCFC) - phrankin, Jun 12, 13:05:20
  - hahahahaha (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jun 12, 13:07:35
    - you brought up a refereeing error. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Jun 12, 13:08:54
- What vendetta arising from some long ago post are you pursuing here, pants? (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Jun 12, 13:04:33
  - vendetta? (NCFC) - pants, Jun 12, 13:06:24
    - NIT PICKING (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jun 12, 13:11:31
      - If only I could think of a Japanese player getting selected in England (NCFC) - Old Git, Jun 12, 13:14:10
        
        been a few racist remarks on here (NCFC) - pants, Jun 12, 13:16:17
      - Nitty Nora! (n/m) (NCFC) - Garry Brooke, Jun 12, 13:12:55
      - I like nip picking (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jun 12, 13:11:59
    - yeah and my initial post was about ambition in the boardroom (NCFC) - phrankin, Jun 12, 13:07:29
      - because you hack at this club at any opportunity (NCFC) - pants, Jun 12, 13:09:09
- Don't forget (NCFC) - phrankin, Jun 12, 13:04:02
  - fair enough (NCFC) - pants, Jun 12, 13:04:50
  - that form over a full season is 23rd position (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Jun 12, 13:04:25
    - It would mean unbeaten at home with 45pts... (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jun 12, 13:08:32
      - you have to include my 3 games with pants 12. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Jun 12, 13:10:36
      - im just stating a fact that the last 15 games after all the tinkering (NCFC) - phrankin, Jun 12, 13:10:16
        
        but that's being selective - our 15 games before that were (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jun 12, 13:12:33
        
        Isn't the point that we had a settled looking team which was performing its socks off (NCFC) - Old Git, Jun 12, 13:17:10
        
        It kind of shows that we only have faith in managers when we're 13 games unbeaten (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jun 12, 13:20:45
        
        Yes but that is the point... WHen the tinkering with personell (NCFC) - phrankin, Jun 12, 13:14:30
        
        All this is telling me is you'll turn on Roeder next season at the first opportunity (NCFC) - pants, Jun 12, 13:18:59
        
        go have a wank (NCFC) - lurd, Jun 12, 13:16:22
        
        Yeh and we stayed up. Like I say Roeder's error if anything (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jun 12, 13:16:21
        
        I think he did a brilliant job keeping us up (NCFC) - phrankin, Jun 12, 13:19:35
        
        Maybe if you didn't grumble so much during the bad patch (NCFC) - pants, Jun 12, 13:22:33
        
        Grumble... like leicester away when I moaned that Henry was left wing Croft right (NCFC) - phrankin, Jun 12, 13:27:47
        
        hahahaa more slagging off (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jun 12, 13:29:15
        
        No... THE SAME QUESTIONNING AS I DID AT THE TIME (NCFC) - phrankin, Jun 12, 13:31:23
        
        No-one forgets that (NCFC) - Old Git, Jun 12, 13:18:37
        
        FFS - I was the main person saying that for the last few games of the season! (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jun 12, 13:28:29

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.