Keep it in-house.

Taking it to the press CERTAINLY wouldn't have helped the issue.

Posted By: Arganth on May 10th 2008 at 11:18:18

Message Thread

Suckers (NCFC) - happy clappy hughes, May 10, 10:16:30
- Eagle is a left back now actually...so not a replacement for Hucks (n/m) (NCFC) - steven, May 10, 12:17:51
- Perhaps we all ought to wear tin foil hats... (NCFC) - Arganth, May 10, 10:28:03
  - Like Devo? (n/m) (NCFC) - Auckland Roeder, May 10, 10:29:17
    - They weren't bad. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arganth, May 10, 10:30:35
      - should be "aren't bad" - they still exist (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, May 10, 23:50:59
- I hope you'll be able to get your head out of Huckerby's arse before he flies to America (NCFC) - LincolnshireCanary, May 10, 10:23:20
  - you should get your head out of Roeders Arse (NCFC) - happy clappy hughes, May 10, 10:38:10
    - Yeah, let's not listen to the bloke who knows what's going on, and listen to you instead. (NCFC) - Arganth, May 10, 10:48:18
      - People listened to Grant and Duffy (NCFC) - phrankin, May 10, 10:52:43
        
        Actually, I'd agree with that too. (NCFC) - Arganth, May 10, 11:02:44
        
        some people on here slagged off Hucks when he made his comments about the team (NCFC) - phrankin, May 10, 11:05:47
        
        No. He was right to do so but the timing, and the manner were wrong (sound familiar?) (NCFC) - Arganth, May 10, 11:08:02
        
        well what else was he supposed to do? (NCFC) - phrankin, May 10, 11:10:43
        
        Keep it in-house. (NCFC) - Arganth, May 10, 11:18:18
        
        it helped Grant get sacked, surely a big positive this season (NCFC) - phrankin, May 10, 11:20:33
        
        I would have thought performances got Grant sacked, not Hucks blubbing. (NCFC) - Arganth, May 10, 11:22:39
        
        Im sure Hucks words helped a little! and to be fair he had good reason to blub (NCFC) - phrankin, May 10, 11:27:18
        
        When you factor in bonus and other benefits (n/m) (NCFC) - the Tilt Man, Apr 1, 20:09:46
        
        Sorry, that should go vvvvvvvv * (n/m) (NCFC) - Arganth, May 10, 11:03:37
        
        Do you honestly believe Roeder is the same as Grant / Duffy ? (n/m) (NCFC) - Arganth, May 10, 10:55:16
        
        nope, I am far more inclined to beleive what Roeder says (NCFC) - phrankin, May 10, 10:57:11
        
        I agree. (NCFC) - Arganth, May 10, 11:00:07
        
        ROFL good point (NCFC) - phrankin, May 10, 11:03:33
        
        Absolutely. (NCFC) - Arganth, May 10, 11:05:25
        
        yeah but lumping HUcks in (NCFC) - phrankin, May 10, 11:06:51
        
        Twunt (n/m) (NCFC) - Boris Johnson MP, May 10, 10:55:10
        
        ... (NCFC) - phrankin, May 10, 10:58:57
        
        No. (n/m) (NCFC) - Boris Johnson MP, May 10, 11:00:06
        
        Here * (n/m) (NCFC) - Arganth, May 10, 11:03:51
        
        well they were being naive... (NCFC) - phrankin, May 10, 11:02:17
        
        ...couldn't actually manage a football team. (NCFC) - Boris Johnson MP, May 10, 11:06:56
        
        ...couldn't actually manage a football team. (NCFC) - phrankin, May 10, 11:07:44
    - Hey, I've said time and time again I'd have kept him and the way he was released was crap (NCFC) - LincolnshireCanary, May 10, 10:39:52
      - I'm not blubing (NCFC) - happy clappy hughes, May 10, 10:41:46
        
        A bit like they did with Grant... talk is cheap (NCFC) - phrankin, May 10, 10:46:23
        
        I know what you mean (NCFC) - LincolnshireCanary, May 10, 10:45:19

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.