Actually, I'd agree with that too.

They were listening to the people best qualified (at that time) to give an opinion as they had the facts at their disposal. So those in charge screwed up - that's a separate issue.

So, naive, no.

Posted By: Arganth on May 10th 2008 at 11:02:44

Message Thread

Suckers (NCFC) - happy clappy hughes, May 10, 10:16:30
- Eagle is a left back now actually...so not a replacement for Hucks (n/m) (NCFC) - steven, May 10, 12:17:51
- Perhaps we all ought to wear tin foil hats... (NCFC) - Arganth, May 10, 10:28:03
  - Like Devo? (n/m) (NCFC) - Auckland Roeder, May 10, 10:29:17
    - They weren't bad. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arganth, May 10, 10:30:35
      - should be "aren't bad" - they still exist (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, May 10, 23:50:59
- I hope you'll be able to get your head out of Huckerby's arse before he flies to America (NCFC) - LincolnshireCanary, May 10, 10:23:20
  - you should get your head out of Roeders Arse (NCFC) - happy clappy hughes, May 10, 10:38:10
    - Yeah, let's not listen to the bloke who knows what's going on, and listen to you instead. (NCFC) - Arganth, May 10, 10:48:18
      - People listened to Grant and Duffy (NCFC) - phrankin, May 10, 10:52:43
        
        Actually, I'd agree with that too. (NCFC) - Arganth, May 10, 11:02:44
        
        some people on here slagged off Hucks when he made his comments about the team (NCFC) - phrankin, May 10, 11:05:47
        
        No. He was right to do so but the timing, and the manner were wrong (sound familiar?) (NCFC) - Arganth, May 10, 11:08:02
        
        well what else was he supposed to do? (NCFC) - phrankin, May 10, 11:10:43
        
        Keep it in-house. (NCFC) - Arganth, May 10, 11:18:18
        
        it helped Grant get sacked, surely a big positive this season (NCFC) - phrankin, May 10, 11:20:33
        
        I would have thought performances got Grant sacked, not Hucks blubbing. (NCFC) - Arganth, May 10, 11:22:39
        
        Im sure Hucks words helped a little! and to be fair he had good reason to blub (NCFC) - phrankin, May 10, 11:27:18
        
        When you factor in bonus and other benefits (n/m) (NCFC) - the Tilt Man, Apr 1, 20:09:46
        
        Sorry, that should go vvvvvvvv * (n/m) (NCFC) - Arganth, May 10, 11:03:37
        
        Do you honestly believe Roeder is the same as Grant / Duffy ? (n/m) (NCFC) - Arganth, May 10, 10:55:16
        
        nope, I am far more inclined to beleive what Roeder says (NCFC) - phrankin, May 10, 10:57:11
        
        I agree. (NCFC) - Arganth, May 10, 11:00:07
        
        ROFL good point (NCFC) - phrankin, May 10, 11:03:33
        
        Absolutely. (NCFC) - Arganth, May 10, 11:05:25
        
        yeah but lumping HUcks in (NCFC) - phrankin, May 10, 11:06:51
        
        Twunt (n/m) (NCFC) - Boris Johnson MP, May 10, 10:55:10
        
        ... (NCFC) - phrankin, May 10, 10:58:57
        
        No. (n/m) (NCFC) - Boris Johnson MP, May 10, 11:00:06
        
        Here * (n/m) (NCFC) - Arganth, May 10, 11:03:51
        
        well they were being naive... (NCFC) - phrankin, May 10, 11:02:17
        
        ...couldn't actually manage a football team. (NCFC) - Boris Johnson MP, May 10, 11:06:56
        
        ...couldn't actually manage a football team. (NCFC) - phrankin, May 10, 11:07:44
    - Hey, I've said time and time again I'd have kept him and the way he was released was crap (NCFC) - LincolnshireCanary, May 10, 10:39:52
      - I'm not blubing (NCFC) - happy clappy hughes, May 10, 10:41:46
        
        A bit like they did with Grant... talk is cheap (NCFC) - phrankin, May 10, 10:46:23
        
        I know what you mean (NCFC) - LincolnshireCanary, May 10, 10:45:19

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.