Does that mean we'll stick with Rudd and Steer?
Seems to be something of a false economy bringing in a keeper if they're only going to be a back-up, particularly if they'll clear off after one season.
Posted By: Dog on May 7th 2008 at 11:09:16
Message Thread
- Hucks has gone, accept it. (NCFC) - Dog, May 7, 10:20:07
- Simon Lappin? (n/m) (NCFC) - revsimon, May 7, 10:32:37
- He's on his way out. (n/m) (NCFC) - Dog, May 7, 10:45:00
- Hoorah! (NCFC) - blindasabat, May 7, 10:26:49
- Realistically, I don't think we're going to get anyone better than Chadders and Croft. (NCFC) - Dog, May 7, 10:27:48
- realistically, i don't think we need anyone better than Chadders and Croft (NCFC) - blindasabat, May 7, 10:33:34
- Oh, thought you were being sarcastic in your original post! (n/m) (NCFC) - Dog, May 7, 10:45:27
- no, not at all (NCFC) - blindasabat, May 7, 10:51:27
- and he looks like a decent enough keeper too (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, May 7, 10:56:30
- That's the thing... (NCFC) - Dog, May 7, 10:58:22
- agreed and yup (NCFC) - blindasabat, May 7, 11:01:31
- You'd have to speculate that he's off wouldn't you? (NCFC) - pants, May 7, 11:03:00
- Does that mean we'll stick with Rudd and Steer? (NCFC) - Dog, May 7, 11:09:16
- hopefully, you can get a loan keeper in easily enough (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, May 7, 11:41:40
- Does that mean we'll stick with Rudd and Steer? (NCFC) - Dog, May 7, 11:09:16
- You'd have to speculate that he's off wouldn't you? (NCFC) - pants, May 7, 11:03:00
- agreed and yup (NCFC) - blindasabat, May 7, 11:01:31
- That's the thing... (NCFC) - Dog, May 7, 10:58:22
- and he looks like a decent enough keeper too (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, May 7, 10:56:30
- no, not at all (NCFC) - blindasabat, May 7, 10:51:27
- Oh, thought you were being sarcastic in your original post! (n/m) (NCFC) - Dog, May 7, 10:45:27
- or maybe just the squad. (n/m) (NCFC) - Dog, May 7, 10:28:02
- realistically, i don't think we need anyone better than Chadders and Croft (NCFC) - blindasabat, May 7, 10:33:34
- Realistically, I don't think we're going to get anyone better than Chadders and Croft. (NCFC) - Dog, May 7, 10:27:48
- I'd say 3 strikers needed, based on Roeder's dislike of Martin (n/m) (NCFC) - LincolnshireCanary, May 7, 10:21:50
- And Cureton... (NCFC) - Dog, May 7, 10:23:16
- I appear to have woken up and it's 2006 (NCFC) - pants, May 7, 10:21:35
- It's okay, I've got an idea, lets buy Robert Earnshaw for £3.5m (NCFC) - pants, May 7, 10:28:56
- I reckon the only way to get him here might be to put a sell-on clause in the contract tho (NCFC) - the101ers, May 7, 10:30:45
- Be careful - that might upset some precious souls if any newly promoted teams offered it. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arganth, May 7, 10:39:58
- I reckon the only way to get him here might be to put a sell-on clause in the contract tho (NCFC) - the101ers, May 7, 10:30:45
- It's okay, I've got an idea, lets buy Robert Earnshaw for £3.5m (NCFC) - pants, May 7, 10:28:56
- Simon Lappin? (n/m) (NCFC) - revsimon, May 7, 10:32:37
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.