no, not at all
i was just trying to highlight the irony that after many years of Worthy failing to sort out our right side of midfield it's now the only area that we got covered adequately ('keepers don't count and besides i reckon Gilks will be off, and who can blame him?)
Posted By: blindasabat on May 7th 2008 at 10:51:27
Message Thread
- Hucks has gone, accept it. (NCFC) - Dog, May 7, 10:20:07
- Simon Lappin? (n/m) (NCFC) - revsimon, May 7, 10:32:37
- He's on his way out. (n/m) (NCFC) - Dog, May 7, 10:45:00
- Hoorah! (NCFC) - blindasabat, May 7, 10:26:49
- Realistically, I don't think we're going to get anyone better than Chadders and Croft. (NCFC) - Dog, May 7, 10:27:48
- realistically, i don't think we need anyone better than Chadders and Croft (NCFC) - blindasabat, May 7, 10:33:34
- Oh, thought you were being sarcastic in your original post! (n/m) (NCFC) - Dog, May 7, 10:45:27
- no, not at all (NCFC) - blindasabat, May 7, 10:51:27
- and he looks like a decent enough keeper too (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, May 7, 10:56:30
- That's the thing... (NCFC) - Dog, May 7, 10:58:22
- agreed and yup (NCFC) - blindasabat, May 7, 11:01:31
- You'd have to speculate that he's off wouldn't you? (NCFC) - pants, May 7, 11:03:00
- Does that mean we'll stick with Rudd and Steer? (NCFC) - Dog, May 7, 11:09:16
- hopefully, you can get a loan keeper in easily enough (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, May 7, 11:41:40
- Does that mean we'll stick with Rudd and Steer? (NCFC) - Dog, May 7, 11:09:16
- You'd have to speculate that he's off wouldn't you? (NCFC) - pants, May 7, 11:03:00
- agreed and yup (NCFC) - blindasabat, May 7, 11:01:31
- That's the thing... (NCFC) - Dog, May 7, 10:58:22
- and he looks like a decent enough keeper too (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, May 7, 10:56:30
- no, not at all (NCFC) - blindasabat, May 7, 10:51:27
- Oh, thought you were being sarcastic in your original post! (n/m) (NCFC) - Dog, May 7, 10:45:27
- or maybe just the squad. (n/m) (NCFC) - Dog, May 7, 10:28:02
- realistically, i don't think we need anyone better than Chadders and Croft (NCFC) - blindasabat, May 7, 10:33:34
- Realistically, I don't think we're going to get anyone better than Chadders and Croft. (NCFC) - Dog, May 7, 10:27:48
- I'd say 3 strikers needed, based on Roeder's dislike of Martin (n/m) (NCFC) - LincolnshireCanary, May 7, 10:21:50
- And Cureton... (NCFC) - Dog, May 7, 10:23:16
- I appear to have woken up and it's 2006 (NCFC) - pants, May 7, 10:21:35
- It's okay, I've got an idea, lets buy Robert Earnshaw for £3.5m (NCFC) - pants, May 7, 10:28:56
- I reckon the only way to get him here might be to put a sell-on clause in the contract tho (NCFC) - the101ers, May 7, 10:30:45
- Be careful - that might upset some precious souls if any newly promoted teams offered it. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arganth, May 7, 10:39:58
- I reckon the only way to get him here might be to put a sell-on clause in the contract tho (NCFC) - the101ers, May 7, 10:30:45
- It's okay, I've got an idea, lets buy Robert Earnshaw for £3.5m (NCFC) - pants, May 7, 10:28:56
- Simon Lappin? (n/m) (NCFC) - revsimon, May 7, 10:32:37
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.