I agree it is poor but

Roeder will argue that he didn't want to treat any player differently from the rest and if he had revealed about Hucks he would have had to do the same with the rest.

Posted By: Charles21 on May 6th 2008 at 20:33:32

Message Thread

Correct decision? Poorly handled? (NCFC) - jonnym6, May 6, 20:23:43
- Good well balanced post Johnny - I think he deserved 1 more year, but absolute legend! (n/m) (NCFC) - Kirrie, May 6, 20:35:28
  - especially given the shite still at the club (NCFC) - SCC 28, May 6, 20:37:08
- The handling of the Huckerby situation has been shameful (NCFC) - Poirot, May 6, 20:30:42
  - Agree that it hasn't been handled well.......but (NCFC) - Kirrie, May 6, 20:39:11
    - Maybe so (NCFC) - Poirot, May 6, 20:45:28
  - I agree it is poor but (NCFC) - Charles21, May 6, 20:33:32
    - Rubbish (NCFC) - Poirot, May 6, 20:35:00
    - yeah hucks is on a par with patrick fucking bexfield (NCFC) - SCC 28, May 6, 20:34:14
      - do one (NCFC) - Charles21, May 6, 20:36:57
        
        roeder acted how he did cos he's tosser (NCFC) - SCC 28, May 6, 20:40:05
        
        The TOSSER that saved us from League 1 you muppet! (n/m) (NCFC) - Kirrie, May 6, 20:48:32
        
        He did indeed save us from League 1 (NCFC) - Poirot, May 6, 20:51:19
        
        Assuming of course that it was solely Roeder's decision!? (n/m) (NCFC) - Kirrie, May 6, 20:54:25
        
        I'm assuming it was (NCFC) - Poirot, May 6, 21:00:33
        
        yes it was all down to him! (NCFC) - SCC 28, May 6, 20:50:05
        
        Would you rather have had Holloway - what were the r eal alternatives??? (n/m) (NCFC) - Kirrie, May 6, 20:51:49
        
        warnock (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, May 6, 20:55:53
      - haha (NCFC) - nixon, May 6, 20:35:24

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.