Yep - and I dont look at that website either, for exactly the same reasons

I'm not limiting my view to NCFC websites - the majority of which are very poor. Look at Waghorns site for example - people hated his first design. After the rebrand however it has become far easier to read and use, and as a result the audience is up (amongst other things that improved on the site of course).

Posted By: Yellalee on April 11th 2008 at 11:15:51

Message Thread

Good Morning Wrathers. Just to let you all know the launch of the Kitty is very close, so (NCFC) - CarrowRoeder, Apr 11, 10:55:47
- CR - Some more reasons to not give up your day job... (NCFC) - Chelmsford Yella, Apr 11, 12:04:16
  - You sound like Sir Alan (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 11, 12:14:01
    - What, a (NCFC) - CB41, Apr 11, 12:18:09
      - Steady on - is that how I come across? (n/m) (NCFC) - Chelmsford Yella, Apr 11, 12:21:48
        
        Well... (NCFC) - Yellalee, Apr 11, 12:22:49
        
        Who asked you t-shirt magnate? (NCFC) - Chelmsford Yella, Apr 11, 12:25:16
        
        Oh yes. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Apr 11, 12:25:53
      - The dawning of self-awareness is a beautiful thing (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Apr 11, 12:20:34
- CR, I know some of the comments here are pretty frivolous, (NCFC) - Fleggster, Apr 11, 11:49:52
- Look, I'm all for people doing their bit, BUT (NCFC) - BFG, Apr 11, 11:48:14
  - what, 10 minutes in 3 months? (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 11, 12:14:34
  - BFG if you bothered to look you would see I was last on here 8th Feb (NCFC) - CarrowRoeder, Apr 11, 11:56:10
    - In that thread you said that... (NCFC) - Fleggster, Apr 11, 12:03:28
      - silence (NCFC) - Dave in France, Apr 11, 12:20:17
        
        *Ner ner ner ner ner icanthearthedifficultquestions ner ner ner ner ner* (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Apr 11, 12:23:46
        
        did we ever establish the charitable status of the kitty? (NCFC) - Dave in France, Apr 11, 12:37:31
        
        yes (NCFC) - blindasabat, Apr 11, 13:59:38
- I think the new site is good (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 11, 11:42:12
  - Thanks Charles (n/m) (NCFC) - CarrowRoeder, Apr 11, 12:00:33
- Least I can check what's on TV (n/m) (NCFC) - harry boulders, Apr 11, 11:32:13
  - And indeed the weather. (NCFC) - yarmyyarmy, Apr 11, 11:35:13
    - I particularly like the number ordering under Revenue Streams :S (n/m) (NCFC) - Fleggster, Apr 11, 11:37:20
      - Lol. Is that our formation for Sunday? (n/m) (NCFC) - yarmyyarmy, Apr 11, 11:39:26
- Good luck with it. I hope it does exceed our low expectations on here. (NCFC) - Yellalee, Apr 11, 11:00:03
  - Must agree bad design n/m (n/m) (NCFC) - Delias Toyboy, Apr 11, 11:32:09
  - Why does it make your eyes bleed? (n/m) (NCFC) - CarrowRoeder, Apr 11, 11:01:09
    - Because it is very poorly designed i'm afraid. It's just not nice to look at. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Apr 11, 11:03:11
      - Is that the new version thats online now? Or the first beta site? (n/m) (NCFC) - CarrowRoeder, Apr 11, 11:05:46
        
        The one I see when I type in the address today. It IS a bit better than the beta version (NCFC) - Yellalee, Apr 11, 11:09:13
        
        And another thing... spelling and grammar (NCFC) - Yellalee, Apr 11, 11:13:42
        
        The spelling etc. is being dealt with, as in being proof read, this is still a beta site (n/m) (NCFC) - CarrowRoeder, Apr 11, 11:24:31
        
        I wouldn't give it a beta, I think it's a Delta minus (NCFC) - Old Git, Apr 11, 11:29:39
        
        as said earlier, the constitution on there is wrong, so ignore it (n/m) (NCFC) - CarrowRoeder, Apr 11, 11:32:32
        
        OK, sooooooooo *draws deep breath and takes heart pill* (NCFC) - Old Git, Apr 11, 11:49:59
        
        *Ner ner ner ner ner icanthearthedifficultquestions ner ner ner ner ner* (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Apr 11, 12:24:02
        
        It's all gone quiet over there, and it's all gone quiet over there (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Apr 11, 12:12:05
        
        Experiencing a strong sense of deja vu (NCFC) - camcan, Apr 11, 11:54:34
        
        Don't think you're going to get any answers, OG (NCFC) - Fleggster, Apr 11, 11:53:36
        
        Why did you publish the site before fully checking it? (n/m) (NCFC) - Brom, Apr 11, 11:26:13
        
        It stil is ongoing at not the finished article, but looking at other NCFC sites I thought (NCFC) - CarrowRoeder, Apr 11, 11:12:40
        
        Serious suggestions (I do some of this stuff for a living) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Apr 11, 11:23:31
        
        Thanks A.B. thats the input I need, I will pass your views on to the web people (n/m) (NCFC) - CarrowRoeder, Apr 11, 11:29:58
        
        Do so...... (NCFC) - Johnny Comecardiff, Apr 11, 11:34:08
        
        My thoughts exactly - if these are professional developers, they can't be (NCFC) - Yellalee, Apr 11, 11:36:44
        
        Also, you get what you pay for. (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Apr 11, 11:40:00
        
        He was still done up like a kipper. (NCFC) - Johnny Comecardiff, Apr 11, 11:44:39
        
        here is teh creators website - strikingly similar in its design.... (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 11, 11:41:21
        
        One of their links on the now famous left-hand link bar is (NCFC) - Yellalee, Apr 11, 11:47:55
        
        you can barely read the stuff on the left menu bar (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 11, 11:50:47
        
        You're more than welcome. If a job's worth doing it's worth doing well. (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Apr 11, 11:33:49
        
        I know shit about web design but you really, really, REALLY need some legal input, dude (NCFC) - Old Git, Apr 11, 11:22:58
        
        The constitution was a first draft, the final one is with the solicitor at the mo. (n/m) (NCFC) - CarrowRoeder, Apr 11, 11:27:56
        
        "the launch of the Kitty is very close" (NCFC) - Old Git, Apr 11, 11:32:05
        
        "the launch of the Kitty is very close" (NCFC) - Old Git, Apr 11, 11:32:04
        
        They have been thought through, and as I said are with the solicitor, you are viewing 2 (NCFC) - CarrowRoeder, Apr 11, 11:34:26
        
        Again (assuming your latest draft covers all of OG's concerns), why (NCFC) - Yellalee, Apr 11, 11:39:54
        
        if something was wanted to keep the interest up (NCFC) - camcan, Apr 11, 11:43:35
        
        Like the sound of Ronald Orifice. (NCFC) - Johnny Comecardiff, Apr 11, 11:45:47
        
        obviously (NCFC) - camcan, Apr 11, 11:46:57
        
        Winner! (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Apr 11, 11:48:15
        
        Why put something that us unchecked onthe internet? (n/m) (NCFC) - Brom, Apr 11, 11:29:08
        
        *is* (NCFC) - Old Git, Apr 11, 11:30:45
        
        Beta testing, so I am told (n/m) (NCFC) - CarrowRoeder, Apr 11, 11:30:38
        
        Ha ha...... (NCFC) - Johnny Comecardiff, Apr 11, 11:36:19
        
        *on the (n/m) (NCFC) - Brom, Apr 11, 11:29:28
        
        ROLF (n/m) (NCFC) - malkybarkid, Apr 11, 11:30:04
        
        Indeedydoodypatoody (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Apr 11, 11:32:37
        
        you have been missed! (n/m) (NCFC) - shoddy, Apr 11, 11:24:05
        
        Not sure CR would agree with you there (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Apr 11, 11:27:40
        
        Other things... (NCFC) - Yellalee, Apr 11, 11:20:30
        
        i'd say it looks a bit 'busy'... (NCFC) - blindasabat, Apr 11, 11:17:06
        
        Yep - and I dont look at that website either, for exactly the same reasons (NCFC) - Yellalee, Apr 11, 11:15:51
        
        * and (n/m) (NCFC) - CarrowRoeder, Apr 11, 11:13:10
        
        Linky linky linky (NCFC) - Old Git, Apr 11, 11:06:37
        
        link (NCFC) - CarrowRoeder, Apr 11, 11:08:30
        
        oh. er, I dont think that site looks good at all. sorry...! (n/m) (NCFC) - shoddy, Apr 11, 11:15:35
      - It has that designed in 1995 by a thirteen-year-old look. Nice (n/m) (NCFC) - Fleggster, Apr 11, 11:05:01
        
        Thanks for the support, constructive views might help (n/m) (NCFC) - CarrowRoeder, Apr 11, 11:07:21
        
        I support the idea 100%, but Yellalee has summed it up correctly... (NCFC) - Fleggster, Apr 11, 11:13:55
        
        So what is the main thing that you all don't like about the site, if I know I can sort it (n/m) (NCFC) - CarrowRoeder, Apr 11, 11:19:33
        
        First suggestions... (NCFC) - Fleggster, Apr 11, 11:22:47
        
        redo the header - it is horribly blurry (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 11, 11:30:10
- Canary Kitty - latest picture (NCFC) - Old Git, Apr 11, 10:58:16
  - Old Git latest picture (NCFC) - CarrowRoeder, Apr 11, 11:01:38
    - Like Leeds United in the 70s (NCFC) - Old Git, Apr 11, 11:04:40

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.