you said he was better than Earnie
which suggests you think we didn't need to sign Earnie because we had him. Well when we had him he was average to poor, as I said above.
Posted By: Charles21 on March 18th 2008 at 19:03:51
Message Thread
- Earnie (NCFC) - Tea Bag Tommy, Mar 18, 17:25:20
- silly old mercenary, lost his place in the wales squad now (NCFC) - pants, Mar 18, 18:12:13
- to be fair... (NCFC) - Rofl_Harris, Mar 18, 18:36:41
- He is one (NCFC) - pants, Mar 18, 18:42:21
- the most successful cretin we had since Walker mk1 (n/m) (NCFC) - Rofl_Harris, Mar 18, 18:58:59
- Had the most money of any manager we've ever had too (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Mar 18, 19:00:12
- He earnt it (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 18, 19:04:20
- It was less than plenty of other teams in the ITV Digital season were spending anyway. (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Mar 18, 19:05:08
- Early worthington I didn't mind (although Emblen 500k will always be a disgrace to me) (NCFC) - pants, Mar 18, 19:36:37
- To be fair to Worthington, his final signings - Croft and Dublin - were pretty good. (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Mar 18, 20:00:46
- Early worthington I didn't mind (although Emblen 500k will always be a disgrace to me) (NCFC) - pants, Mar 18, 19:36:37
- It was less than plenty of other teams in the ITV Digital season were spending anyway. (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Mar 18, 19:05:08
- He earnt it (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 18, 19:04:20
- Had the most money of any manager we've ever had too (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Mar 18, 19:00:12
- the most successful cretin we had since Walker mk1 (n/m) (NCFC) - Rofl_Harris, Mar 18, 18:58:59
- He is one (NCFC) - pants, Mar 18, 18:42:21
- yeah (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 18, 18:34:00
- not always an argument I think holds much weight (NCFC) - pants, Mar 18, 18:37:11
- alot of goals are insignificant (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 18, 18:46:02
- We got a decent striker in the same month on loan (NCFC) - pants, Mar 18, 18:47:38
- JJ? We played him but just many times on the RW though (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Mar 18, 18:49:32
- he was average to poor anyway (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 18, 18:50:10
- I thought JJ looked quite good (NCFC) - phrankin, Mar 18, 18:55:16
- indeed which is why he was put out to RW - cos Worthy was obsessed with that (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Mar 18, 18:56:15
- pmsl (NCFC) - pants, Mar 18, 18:52:28
- Have to disagree (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 18, 18:56:14
- Using that, I thought Cottee was shit, rubbish career (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Mar 18, 18:58:09
- prolific (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 18, 19:01:12
- Think that's where you and I agree (NCFC) - pants, Mar 18, 19:03:46
- Off out now (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 18, 19:05:36
- Playing for the strongest team as well, against plenty of very weak ones. (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Mar 18, 19:14:17
- He was still a better player than Earnshaw imo (NCFC) - pants, Mar 18, 19:17:53
- You mean attacking midfielder Brian Laudrup? (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 18, 22:36:57
- He was still a better player than Earnshaw imo (NCFC) - pants, Mar 18, 19:17:53
- very stupid argument (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Mar 18, 19:12:59
- Playing for the strongest team as well, against plenty of very weak ones. (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Mar 18, 19:14:17
- Off out now (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 18, 19:05:36
- Think that's where you and I agree (NCFC) - pants, Mar 18, 19:03:46
- not really cos Charles says he 'wasn't the player he used to be' (NCFC) - Brandonio, Mar 18, 19:00:34
- Yet he disagreed that he was a better player than Earnshaw despite (NCFC) - pants, Mar 18, 19:01:31
- you said he was better than Earnie (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 18, 19:03:51
- because he wasn't used properly (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Mar 18, 19:05:08
- I'm saying nothing.. (NCFC) - snowman, Mar 18, 19:03:29
- Earnie's better no doubt - look at their stats in English football (NCFC) - Brandonio, Mar 18, 19:03:11
- you said he was better than Earnie (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 18, 19:03:51
- Yet he disagreed that he was a better player than Earnshaw despite (NCFC) - pants, Mar 18, 19:01:31
- prolific (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 18, 19:01:12
- sort of agree from what I remember (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Mar 18, 18:56:40
- Using that, I thought Cottee was shit, rubbish career (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Mar 18, 18:58:09
- Have to disagree (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 18, 18:56:14
- I thought JJ looked quite good (NCFC) - phrankin, Mar 18, 18:55:16
- he was average to poor anyway (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 18, 18:50:10
- JJ? We played him but just many times on the RW though (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Mar 18, 18:49:32
- We got a decent striker in the same month on loan (NCFC) - pants, Mar 18, 18:47:38
- I like the 'The only thing he ever did was score goals' argument (NCFC) - Brandonio, Mar 18, 18:44:01
- If he's so well thought of though, why has he not been in a successful team (NCFC) - pants, Mar 18, 18:46:19
- as he's been sitting on the bench of a Premiership team (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 18, 18:47:14
- Why did Dean Ashton fail at Crewe and Norwich in this division then? (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Mar 18, 18:47:09
- He was always injured with us, despite what people want to believe (NCFC) - pants, Mar 18, 18:51:49
- and I dunno why Cardiff finished 13th - I'm not a Cardiff fan (NCFC) - Brandonio, Mar 18, 18:55:34
- that doesn't answer the question (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 18, 18:55:28
- that's why he will always be a failure then (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Mar 18, 18:53:58
- good question (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 18, 18:50:37
- snarl snarl (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Mar 18, 18:52:08
- He was always injured with us, despite what people want to believe (NCFC) - pants, Mar 18, 18:51:49
- If he's so well thought of though, why has he not been in a successful team (NCFC) - pants, Mar 18, 18:46:19
- alot of goals are insignificant (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 18, 18:46:02
- not always an argument I think holds much weight (NCFC) - pants, Mar 18, 18:37:11
- to be fair... (NCFC) - Rofl_Harris, Mar 18, 18:36:41
- What a lovely story. (n/m) (NCFC) - tudders, Mar 18, 17:40:03
- silly old mercenary, lost his place in the wales squad now (NCFC) - pants, Mar 18, 18:12:13
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.