Is an eye for the future - - Wrath of the Barclay

Is an eye for the future -

Is an eye for the future playing loan players who won’t be here next season?

FWIW - I don’t have a problem with losing to Leicester, our run was going to come to an end sometime. I’m hoping we at least gave away all our bad goals in one game. I don’t have a problem with loan players in the squad either. They’ve, or rather some of them have served us well in a time of crisis.

Where I do have a problem though is starting a game with as good as ten men, which we did against Hull and again at Leicester

Posted By: KentonCanary on February 18th 2008 at 12:49:31

Message Thread

Why is everyone so hung up on Hucks (NCFC) - trevor hockeys beard, Feb 18, 11:22:21
- Is an eye for the future - (NCFC) - KentonCanary, Feb 18, 12:49:31
- we are 90% certain since Roeder's last two dubious selections (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 18, 11:31:11
  - I disagree, i don't think any changes would have prevented saturday (n/m) (NCFC) - wgf500, Feb 18, 11:32:38
    - For a start it didnt help playing 2 right wingers (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 18, 11:36:35
      - yeha i'd have played pattison, but io don' t think it would've made any difference... (NCFC) - wgf500, Feb 18, 11:40:51
        
        yeah but why start 2 right wingers (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 18, 11:52:53
        
        i'm not saying hucks shouldn't have been in the 16... (NCFC) - wgf500, Feb 18, 11:54:50
        
        ah just read what you put again and i read it the wrong way apologies (n/m) (NCFC) - wgf500, Feb 18, 11:55:37
    - I actually think Pattison should ahve played on the left (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 18, 11:34:21
- If ... (NCFC) - NoReevesNoFuture, Feb 18, 11:29:28
  - Run with a really wobbly bum (n/m) (NCFC) - malkybarkid, Feb 18, 12:34:45
  - Maybe, maybe not. But. Crofty is likely to be here next season. Hucks probably will not. T (n/m) (NCFC) - trevor hockeys beard, Feb 18, 11:32:53
  - I didn't realise this was a Croft vs Hucks debate (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 18, 11:32:40
    - Huckerby... (NCFC) - NoReevesNoFuture, Feb 18, 11:40:25
    - It's not (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 18, 11:36:15
      - How he was not in the 16, or even the 18 that travelled (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 18, 11:39:51
      - I've never said he was old shit and slow. However, I stand by my earlier post. (n/m) (NCFC) - trevor hockeys beard, Feb 18, 11:39:45
        
        I wasn't expecting the Spanish Inquisition (n/m) (NCFC) - trevor hockeys beard, Feb 18, 11:44:35
        
        Henry and Gibbs will probably not (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 18, 11:40:23
  - Boggle his eyes. Croft's got the ace of trumps on that one. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Feb 18, 11:30:43
- also (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 18, 11:27:43
  - too true.... (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 18, 11:31:50
- building 4 next year lol? none of the loanees will be here 4 a start-hucks just doesnt (NCFC) - selwyn, Feb 18, 11:26:04
  - How do you know the loanee's won't be here? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 18, 11:30:30
    - Doubt they all will be (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 18, 11:33:31
    - Exactly (n/m) (NCFC) - trevor hockeys beard, Feb 18, 11:31:37
- "picking players who will not be here next season is not conducive to that plan" (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 18, 11:24:34
  - How do you know this though? (NCFC) - pants, Feb 18, 11:34:01
    - Dion's retiring. Ched is too expensive (how I would LOVe to be wrong about that) (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 18, 11:48:25
      - Are you saying you think Gibbs is the business then? (NCFC) - pants, Feb 18, 11:52:53
        
        True (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 18, 12:00:36
        
        I don't know, I haven't seen him, one thing I will say though is (NCFC) - pants, Feb 18, 12:05:34
        
        Bertrand looked very good in his first home game (NCFC) - KentonCanary, Feb 18, 12:56:42
    - Dion (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 18, 11:35:23
  - apart from dion and who would you pick instead of him? (NCFC) - trevor hockeys beard, Feb 18, 11:30:20
  - Can I leave them to you today OG? (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 18, 11:25:48
    - To go on the theory that Huckerby is allowed to speak out and do this and that because (NCFC) - pants, Feb 18, 11:48:35
    - Big night out? (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 18, 11:28:27
      - First day back at work (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 18, 11:32:19
        
        Good thinking (n/m) (NCFC) - trevor hockeys beard, Feb 18, 11:35:25
- this debate is still going on? (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 18, 11:22:44

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.