To go on the theory that Huckerby is allowed to speak out and do this and that because
he's a legend, is one that accept. I agree that someone who has done the greater good deserves to be heard and respected
In the same breath, someone that comes and takes a team from bottom to the comfort zone, and even with a dream in sight, the play offs, also deserves that respect
The constant question of the Huckerby being played when he's leaving, is constant questioning of the manager and whether he's up to it
Which is the point you and OG are sticking too in the whole "but Huckerby should at least be on the bench"
If Roeder thinks he needs to plan for next season without Huckerby, then in my opinion, he's earnt that decision going on the results he's pulled out of the fire with us
In some instances I agree he should be on the bench, but in the same breath I don't see the point of the uproar either
Posted By: pants on February 18th 2008 at 11:48:35
Message Thread
- Why is everyone so hung up on Hucks (NCFC) - trevor hockeys beard, Feb 18, 11:22:21
- Is an eye for the future - (NCFC) - KentonCanary, Feb 18, 12:49:31
- we are 90% certain since Roeder's last two dubious selections (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 18, 11:31:11
- I disagree, i don't think any changes would have prevented saturday (n/m) (NCFC) - wgf500, Feb 18, 11:32:38
- For a start it didnt help playing 2 right wingers (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 18, 11:36:35
- yeha i'd have played pattison, but io don' t think it would've made any difference... (NCFC) - wgf500, Feb 18, 11:40:51
- yeah but why start 2 right wingers (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 18, 11:52:53
- i'm not saying hucks shouldn't have been in the 16... (NCFC) - wgf500, Feb 18, 11:54:50
- ah just read what you put again and i read it the wrong way apologies (n/m) (NCFC) - wgf500, Feb 18, 11:55:37
- i'm not saying hucks shouldn't have been in the 16... (NCFC) - wgf500, Feb 18, 11:54:50
- yeah but why start 2 right wingers (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 18, 11:52:53
- yeha i'd have played pattison, but io don' t think it would've made any difference... (NCFC) - wgf500, Feb 18, 11:40:51
- I actually think Pattison should ahve played on the left (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 18, 11:34:21
- For a start it didnt help playing 2 right wingers (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 18, 11:36:35
- I disagree, i don't think any changes would have prevented saturday (n/m) (NCFC) - wgf500, Feb 18, 11:32:38
- If ... (NCFC) - NoReevesNoFuture, Feb 18, 11:29:28
- Run with a really wobbly bum (n/m) (NCFC) - malkybarkid, Feb 18, 12:34:45
- Maybe, maybe not. But. Crofty is likely to be here next season. Hucks probably will not. T (n/m) (NCFC) - trevor hockeys beard, Feb 18, 11:32:53
- I didn't realise this was a Croft vs Hucks debate (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 18, 11:32:40
- Huckerby... (NCFC) - NoReevesNoFuture, Feb 18, 11:40:25
- It's not (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 18, 11:36:15
- How he was not in the 16, or even the 18 that travelled (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 18, 11:39:51
- I've never said he was old shit and slow. However, I stand by my earlier post. (n/m) (NCFC) - trevor hockeys beard, Feb 18, 11:39:45
- I wasn't expecting the Spanish Inquisition (n/m) (NCFC) - trevor hockeys beard, Feb 18, 11:44:35
- Henry and Gibbs will probably not (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 18, 11:40:23
- Boggle his eyes. Croft's got the ace of trumps on that one. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Feb 18, 11:30:43
- also (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 18, 11:27:43
- too true.... (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 18, 11:31:50
- building 4 next year lol? none of the loanees will be here 4 a start-hucks just doesnt (NCFC) - selwyn, Feb 18, 11:26:04
- How do you know the loanee's won't be here? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 18, 11:30:30
- Doubt they all will be (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 18, 11:33:31
- Exactly (n/m) (NCFC) - trevor hockeys beard, Feb 18, 11:31:37
- How do you know the loanee's won't be here? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 18, 11:30:30
- "picking players who will not be here next season is not conducive to that plan" (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 18, 11:24:34
- How do you know this though? (NCFC) - pants, Feb 18, 11:34:01
- Dion's retiring. Ched is too expensive (how I would LOVe to be wrong about that) (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 18, 11:48:25
- Are you saying you think Gibbs is the business then? (NCFC) - pants, Feb 18, 11:52:53
- True (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 18, 12:00:36
- I don't know, I haven't seen him, one thing I will say though is (NCFC) - pants, Feb 18, 12:05:34
- Bertrand looked very good in his first home game (NCFC) - KentonCanary, Feb 18, 12:56:42
- I don't know, I haven't seen him, one thing I will say though is (NCFC) - pants, Feb 18, 12:05:34
- True (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 18, 12:00:36
- Are you saying you think Gibbs is the business then? (NCFC) - pants, Feb 18, 11:52:53
- Dion (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 18, 11:35:23
- Dion's retiring. Ched is too expensive (how I would LOVe to be wrong about that) (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 18, 11:48:25
- apart from dion and who would you pick instead of him? (NCFC) - trevor hockeys beard, Feb 18, 11:30:20
- Can I leave them to you today OG? (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 18, 11:25:48
- To go on the theory that Huckerby is allowed to speak out and do this and that because (NCFC) - pants, Feb 18, 11:48:35
- Big night out? (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 18, 11:28:27
- First day back at work (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 18, 11:32:19
- Good thinking (n/m) (NCFC) - trevor hockeys beard, Feb 18, 11:35:25
- First day back at work (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 18, 11:32:19
- How do you know this though? (NCFC) - pants, Feb 18, 11:34:01
- this debate is still going on? (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 18, 11:22:44
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.