Is correct.
Hucks is better as a winger than those two but is NOW inferior to Croft.
That said, a prime Hucks is better than Croft can ever aspire to be.
Posted By: Johnny Comecardiff on February 17th 2008 at 20:58:57
Message Thread
- FAO: LincolnshireCanary re:Hucks (NCFC) - Chopper, Feb 17, 20:49:15
- Chopper and Hux you all must read. (NCFC) - Tilly, Feb 17, 20:59:46
- It's not a case of being better than Bertarnd (NCFC) - NobodyherebutusCreos, Feb 17, 20:56:58
- Is correct. (NCFC) - Johnny Comecardiff, Feb 17, 20:58:57
- agreed (and with Creo post too) (n/m) (NCFC) - blindasabat, Feb 18, 10:24:54
- And croft still lacks an end product often enough (n/m) (NCFC) - WorthyHatesFans, Feb 17, 21:43:18
- Is correct. (NCFC) - Johnny Comecardiff, Feb 17, 20:58:57
- potd. (n/m) (NCFC) - Andyjzr, Feb 17, 20:51:14
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.