There's a difference between 'fit to play' and being 100% fit
Huckerby hasn't been the same player for the last two seasons.
If he's lost a yard of pace then he's lost his ability to turn games.
Posted By: Ben on February 16th 2008 at 15:02:35
Message Thread
- Has anyone considered that Huckerby's hip problem might be the reason? (NCFC) - Ben, Feb 16, 14:54:07
- doesnt mean he is beyond critism and he has got this 1 wrong (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Feb 16, 14:57:14
- its true - hopefully there are reasons for thee two games baffling selections (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 16, 14:55:29
- roeder has said he's fit to play but has been dropped (n/m) (NCFC) - Dorothy, Feb 16, 14:55:29
- There's a difference between 'fit to play' and being 100% fit (NCFC) - Ben, Feb 16, 15:02:35
- thats bollocks (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Feb 16, 15:04:08
- no it isn't you idiot, cortizone????? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 16, 15:21:07
- yeah but you think Hucks is great, even when he's played on the right... (n/m) (NCFC) - blindasabat, Feb 16, 15:13:48
- thats bollocks (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Feb 16, 15:04:08
- There's a difference between 'fit to play' and being 100% fit (NCFC) - Ben, Feb 16, 15:02:35
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.