Has anyone considered that Huckerby's hip problem might be the reason?

Just because he's 'fit' to play doesn't mean the injury hasn't affected his game negatively.

I agree that Gibbs was bollocks on Tuesday but Roeder has us just about top of the form league.

Posted By: Ben on February 16th 2008 at 14:54:07

Message Thread

Has anyone considered that Huckerby's hip problem might be the reason? (NCFC) - Ben, Feb 16, 14:54:07
- doesnt mean he is beyond critism and he has got this 1 wrong (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Feb 16, 14:57:14
- its true - hopefully there are reasons for thee two games baffling selections (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 16, 14:55:29
- roeder has said he's fit to play but has been dropped (n/m) (NCFC) - Dorothy, Feb 16, 14:55:29
  - There's a difference between 'fit to play' and being 100% fit (NCFC) - Ben, Feb 16, 15:02:35
    - thats bollocks (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Feb 16, 15:04:08
      - no it isn't you idiot, cortizone????? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 16, 15:21:07
      - yeah but you think Hucks is great, even when he's played on the right... (n/m) (NCFC) - blindasabat, Feb 16, 15:13:48

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.