You're the one that's blubbing.
The points I make (wich you seem to agree with) have everything to do with how Roeder has treated Hucks.
We now have competition for places for example, you were banging on about Semi possibly being a little upset yesterday because he lost his place to Bates.
What do you want? People playing for their places and bringing the best out of them as a result (which is clearly happening) or people knowing their place in the side is safe?
You don't seem to be able to cross the barrier of this one issue to see that Roeder has treated them all much the same. They've all been given their chances. Everyone from Brellier, Murray, etc through to the loanees and Hucks.
I totally and utterly accept that Hucks ought to be at least on the bench but only if he is mentally and physically up to it.
Posted By: Chalk Hill Bitter on February 15th 2008 at 11:51:52
Message Thread
- Bye bye Hucks.... (NCFC) - DemoniCanary, Feb 15, 10:53:38
- "I've had a chance to make my mind up, Huckerby has made his own mind up that he's leaving (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 15, 11:16:46
- To me it sounds more like (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 15, 11:51:51
- ... (NCFC) - blindasabat, Feb 15, 11:45:50
- oh, and Hucks was in the squad against Hull not left out of it (n/m) (NCFC) - blindasabat, Feb 15, 11:56:14
- I' don't think this is buck passing, its just an off-hand comment... (NCFC) - Maillot Jaune, Feb 15, 11:34:18
- "to let everyone know that Hucks made the decision to quit not him getting rid of a City (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 15, 11:37:52
- You really are a complete twat (NCFC) - Chalk Hill Bitter, Feb 15, 11:24:09
- Why on earth should you think that playing Hucks rather than Gibbs would send us down? (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 15, 11:28:23
- I didn't say anything about Gibbs (NCFC) - Chalk Hill Bitter, Feb 15, 11:37:46
- Blub blubbity blub (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 15, 11:44:29
- You're the one that's blubbing. (NCFC) - Chalk Hill Bitter, Feb 15, 11:51:52
- Blub blubbity blub (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 15, 11:44:29
- I didn't say anything about Gibbs (NCFC) - Chalk Hill Bitter, Feb 15, 11:37:46
- Why on earth should you think that playing Hucks rather than Gibbs would send us down? (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 15, 11:28:23
- Prob a bit of a 'six of one, half a dozen of the other' (n/m) (NCFC) - DemoniCanary, Feb 15, 11:19:29
- shut up you idiot (NCFC) - Only1Doherty, Feb 15, 11:19:07
- I don't think that criticising Roeder's treatment of Hucks makes me an idiot (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 15, 11:23:53
- you think on recent performances hucks deserves a place in the team? (n/m) (NCFC) - Only1Doherty, Feb 15, 11:27:33
- Yes, at least for 30 mins super-subbing (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 15, 11:29:09
- I expect a lot more from Gibbs in his next game... (NCFC) - DemoniCanary, Feb 15, 11:33:19
- Bertrand has been good (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 15, 11:36:43
- I expect a lot more from Gibbs in his next game... (NCFC) - DemoniCanary, Feb 15, 11:33:19
- Yes, at least for 30 mins super-subbing (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 15, 11:29:09
- you think on recent performances hucks deserves a place in the team? (n/m) (NCFC) - Only1Doherty, Feb 15, 11:27:33
- I don't think that criticising Roeder's treatment of Hucks makes me an idiot (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 15, 11:23:53
- "I've had a chance to make my mind up, Huckerby has made his own mind up that he's leaving (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 15, 11:16:46
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.